Acta Cardiologica – Bias and Credibility

Acta Cardiologica - Pro Science - Least Biased - Credible

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate Acta Cardiologica as a Pro-Science source. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to rigorous peer review and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (0.5)
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Acta Cardiologica is a peer-reviewed open-access journal published by Taylor & Francis that covers developments in Cardiology. According to its about page, “Acta Cardiologica is an international journal. It publishes bi-monthly original, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease including observational studies, clinical trials, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance and tutorials.”

Taylor & Francis is an academic and professional publishing platform that hosts a wide range of peer-reviewed journals and research articles across various disciplines, including social sciences, humanities, health sciences, engineering, and more. Founded in 1798, Taylor & Francis is a major global publisher that provides resources for researchers, scholars, and students.

Read our profile on the UK’s media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Informa PLC, a multinational publishing, business intelligence, and exhibitions group, owns the publisher Taylor & Francis. It generates revenue from institutional subscriptions, pay-per-view article purchases, and through partnerships with academic institutions.

Analysis / Bias

Acta Cardiologica is an open-access journal that publishes information and research related to Cardiology. An example article is as follows: Valvular heart disease and heart-related disease: a bibliometric and visual analysis from 2000 to 2023.



Taylor & Francis is an open-access publisher of scientific journals. There are two types of Open Access Journals, legitimate and predatory, both of which charge the author for publication. Predatory journals often lack peer review and are generally considered not credible. Taylor & Francis is considered a legitimate, open-access publisher that is frequently indexed in PubMed

Although Taylor & Francis has retracted some studies in other publications that were found to be of poor methodology and not thoroughly peer-reviewed, Acta Cardiologica publishes credible scientific studies that are factual and appropriately peer-reviewed.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Acta Cardiologica as a Pro-Science source. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to rigorous peer review and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 02/01/2025)

Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/tacd20

Last Updated on February 1, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: