MBFC’s Daily Vetted Fact Checks for 11/23/2024 (Weekend Edition)

Media Bias Fact Check selects and publishes fact checks from around the world. We only utilize fact-checkers that are either a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) or have been verified as credible by MBFC. Further, we review each fact check for accuracy before publishing. We fact-check the fact-checkers and let you know their bias. When appropriate, we explain the rating and/or offer our own rating if we disagree with the fact-checker. (D. Van Zandt)

Claim Codes: Red = Fact Check on a Right Claim, Blue = Fact Check on a Left Claim, Black = Not Political/Conspiracy/Pseudoscience/Other

Fact Checker bias rating Codes: Red = Right-Leaning, Green = Least Biased, Blue = Left-Leaning, Black = Unrated by MBFC

FALSE Claim via Social Media: “The Harris campaign spent $583 million on staff expenses.”

The Dispatch Rating: False (The claim that Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign allocated $583 million solely to staff is grossly exaggerated and lacks credible sourcing. An analysis of campaign expenditures confirms that this figure is entirely inaccurate.)

No, the Harris Campaign Did Not Spend $583 Million on Staff

FALSE Claim via Social Media: 75% of the brain is myelin, which is 100% cholesterol; “Alzheimer’s never existed until 1979”; in the 1970s, animal fats in margarine were replaced with low-cholesterol vegetable oils

Health Feedback rating: Incorrect (Alzheimer’s didn’t appear in 1979. The disease was formally described for the first time in 1906. Aging, not margarine, is behind the rise in Alzheimer’s in recent decades.)

Population aging, not margarine or a low-cholesterol diet, is behind the rise in Alzheimer’s

BLATANT
LIE
Claim via Social Media: Trump threatened to arrest Justin Trudeau if he sets foot in the US.

Lead Stories rating: False (Fake Audio)

Fact Check: Trump Did NOT Threaten To Arrest Trudeau If He Sets …

FALSE (International: Romania): A post on X claimed that a Romanian court dismissed all criminal charges against social media influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate

Check Your Fact rating: False (The full case against the two was not dismissed. There will be a new hearing in December.)

FACT CHECK: Were All Charges Dismissed Against Andrew and …

Disclaimer: We are providing links to fact-checks by third-party fact-checkers. If you do not agree with a fact check, please directly contact the source of that fact check.


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation


Follow Media Bias Fact Check: 

BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mediabiasfactcheck.bsky.social

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Media_Bias_Fact_Check/

Threads: https://www.threads.net/@mediabiasfactcheck

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MBFC_News

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mediabiasfactcheck

Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@mediabiasfactcheck

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediabiasfactcheck/

Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/mbfcnews/

The Latest Factual News

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

Subscribe With Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 21.8K other subscribers



Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments