Daily Source Bias Check: Center For Security Policy

Mixed Factual Reporting - Not always Credible

Center for Security Policy - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Fake News - Not Credible - Hate GroupQUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or iino sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Center for Security and Policy (CSP) Questionable source based on far right neoconservative viewpoints, promotion of conspiracies related to Islam and third party claims of hate group connections.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Far Right, Conspiracy, Anti-Islam, Third Party Hate Group Designations
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180

History

Founded in 1988, The Center for Security Policy (CSP) is a Washington, D.C. based national security think tank that has been widely accused of engaging in conspiracy theorizing by a range of individuals, media outlets and organizations. Its activities are focused on exposing and researching perceived jihadist threats to the United States.  The Southern Poverty Law Center has described it as “a conspiracy-oriented mouthpiece for the growing anti-Muslim movement in the United States.”

The founder and President is Frank Gaffney, Jr., who is described as an “American anti-Muslim conspiracy theorist.”

Funded by / Ownership

The Center for Security Policy is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organization that is funded through donations. According to Wikipedia, “In 2013, CSP received donations from Boeing ($25,000); General Dynamics ($15,000); Lockheed Martin ($15,000); Northrup Grumman ($5,000); Raytheon ($20,000); and General Electric ($5,000). The group has also received $1.4 million from the Bradley Foundation.



Analysis / Bias

In review, The CSP publishes news related to USA security with a focus on the dangers of Islam. News headlines are somewhat sensationalized and often demonize Islam such as this: Gaffney: Christian persecution taking place around the world is “simply unimaginable”. This story was published on the Questionable Breitbart News

Editorially, CSP favors President Trump such as this: The Anti-Trump Conspiracy Probe Goes Criminal and denigrates the left such as this: AOC’s Weak Attempt to Paint Trump’s Criticism of Rep. Schiff as “Anti-Semitic”. This latter story is properly sourced. 

Media Bias Fact Check does not determine if a source is a hate group or not, but we do provide third party observations which you can find below.

In general, CSP favors a neoconservative policy that is hawkish toward Islam.

A factual search reveals a failed fact check.

Overall, we rate the Center for Security and Policy (CSP) Questionable source based on far right neoconservative viewpoints, promotion of conspiracies related to Islam and third party claims of hate group connections. (11/19/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 11/2/2019)

Source: https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

Subscribe With Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22.9K other subscribers



Be the first to comment on "Daily Source Bias Check: Center For Security Policy"

Comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.