QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Wired Conservative as Right-Biased and Questionable due to its promotion of one-sided right-wing propaganda, lack of transparency, and non-existent sourcing practices.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Lack of Transparency, Poor Sourcing
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (8.4)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Wired Conservative was launched to offer daily political and editorial news specifically for conservative readers, billing itself as an antidote to “left-wing taint” in mainstream media. The site lists a virtual address at a UPS store in Delray Beach, Florida, and provides limited transparency about its origin, leadership, and editorial standards. It is part of a larger network of content-rich political sites that often republish ideologically aligned stories with minimal attribution or original reporting.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The ownership of Wired Conservative is undisclosed. Its only visible monetization comes via heavy advertising and newsletter signups. Given its layout and monetization tactics, Wired Conservative may be part of a network of click-driven conservative content farms that aim to collect email addresses for political or commercial targeting.
Analysis / Bias
Wired Conservative exhibits a strong Right Bias with overwhelmingly positive coverage of Donald Trump and MAGA-aligned figures, and frequent demonization of Democrats and progressive causes. For example:
- “Dems Melt Down Over Vance’s Disneyland Trip” mocks Democratic critics of J.D. Vance, using terms like “panicking,” “unhinged,” and “mocking traditional families,” with no hyperlinks, quotes, or neutral sources.
- “AOC’s Radical New Ally Sends Democrats Into Hiding” portrays Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani as an existential threat to the party, while asserting that the “radical wing… is the party” without citing data or external analysis.
- “Obama Sounds Alarm on the Left’s Boy Problem” interprets Obama’s remarks on masculinity in a partisan frame, attacking “the modern left’s one-sided gender activism” with no external validation.
- “Trump Tightens the Screws on Canada” frames Trump’s tariff policy as strong leadership with no policy details or opposing viewpoints.
The site employs a heavy-handed editorial voice, editorializing nearly every sentence, with little distinction between opinion and reporting. Many articles lack links, quotes, or direct sourcing and instead present unverified assertions. This absence of transparent sourcing significantly impacts factual credibility.
Failed Fact Check
- As of this review, Wired Conservative has not been the subject of formal fact-checks by known third-party organizations. However, the site’s reliance on one-sided, unsourced commentary and lack of editorial transparency indicate a low factual baseline.
Overall, we rate Wired Conservative as Right-Biased and Questionable due to its promotion of one-sided right-wing propaganda, lack of transparency, and non-existent sourcing practices. (D. Van Zandt 07/19/2025)
Source: https://wiredconservative.com/
Last Updated on July 19, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

