While You Were Out is rated Least biased with Mixed factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate While You Were Out Least Biased because it uses neutral aggregation and deliberately presents competing political viewpoints. We rate it Mixed and Questionable because nearly all editorial work is performed by AI with limited human oversight, and the site’s own early accuracy audit found a substantial correction rate despite improved sourcing safeguards.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: AI-Generated Content, Limited Human Oversight
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (0.0)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
While You Were Out is a U.S.-based daily news aggregation service launched in 2026. It publishes morning and evening news briefings, Minnesota news, trending stories, podcasts, videos, and topic timelines.
According to its How This Runs page, one person, Robbie in Brainerd, Minnesota, runs the operation using Anthropic’s Claude artificial-intelligence model. Claude performs nearly all research, fact-checking, writing, narration, video production, website publishing, and email production, while Robbie sets editorial rules and handles tasks requiring human approval.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
While You Were Out is independently operated by Robbie, who states that he owns the publication. The site does not provide a full name, corporate entity, or detailed financial information. As of October 2026, it reports running no advertising.
Analysis / Bias
While You Were Out does not display a consistent Left or Right political bias. Its stated rules require political stories to describe competing viewpoints in their own terms and prohibit editorial opinion. For example, Kimberly Guilfoyle out as U.S. ambassador to Greece at White House request separately presents the White House’s account and Guilfoyle’s denial.
Likewise, Yemen’s government announces offensive to retake Houthi-held territory presents claims from both the Yemeni government and Houthis while explicitly noting that casualty claims could not be independently verified.
The primary concern is factual reliability under an almost entirely AI-operated production system. The site itself reports that an early accuracy audit found 4 of 10 sampled stories required corrections, prompting stricter rules requiring confirmation from at least two established news outlets. It also publicly logs corrections rather than silently editing errors.
Current stories generally cite multiple established outlets and clearly distinguish confirmed information from developing or disputed claims. However, because Claude performs nearly all research, verification, and writing with limited human editorial review, and because the publication has only a very short operating history, confidence in long-term reliability remains limited.
Failed Fact Checks
- None found from major third-party fact-checking organizations.
- The publication reports multiple internal corrections and states that an early audit found 4 of 10 sampled stories needed fixes.
Overall, we rate While You Were Out Least Biased because it uses neutral aggregation and deliberately presents competing political viewpoints. We rate it Mixed and Questionable because nearly all editorial work is performed by AI with limited human oversight, and the site’s own early accuracy audit found a substantial correction rate despite improved sourcing safeguards. (D. Van Zandt 10/20/2026)
Source: https://whileyouwereoutnews.com/
Last Updated on October 20, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.
No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.
- Remove all ads instantly
- Support independent ratings
- Cancel any time — no strings
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources