The Noticer – Bias and Credibility

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Noticer as Far-Right Biased and questionable based on its consistent promotion of white nationalist talking points, racial animus, and anti-immigrant framing. We also rate it Low for factual reporting due to poor sourcing, anonymous authorship, lack of transparency, and inflammatory, misleading content.

---

History

The Noticer is an Australia-based digital news and opinion website that claims to publish “unbiased” news and content overlooked by mainstream outlets. It promotes itself as fiercely independent, self-funded, and resistant to “political correctness,” stating it does not use Indigenous dual place names, gender-affirming pronouns, or censorship practices. The site provides a platform for anonymous writers, including those rejected by “corporate media.”

Read our profile on Australian media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

The site is self-funded and accepts donations via its support page, as well as running display advertising. Ownership is not clearly disclosed, and no editorial board or staff are listed.

Analysis / Bias

The Noticer exhibits extreme far-right editorial bias, frequently publishing content that targets immigrants, minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, Indigenous Australians, and Jewish people. Articles like “African thug who kicked dying Melbourne doctor after stabbing is already free” and “Muslim civil servant jailed for approving asylum claims for cash bribes” portray non-white individuals with inflammatory language, racial stereotypes, and gratuitous detail irrelevant to journalistic standards.

One of the clearest examples of racial animus is the “Australia’s 2024 Rich List top ten includes three Jews and two divorcees who got half their husbands’ fortunes” article, which gratuitously notes the religion and race of Jewish individuals while deriding female divorcees as wealthy only because of their ex-husbands. Another, “ABC covers up antiwhite racist attack,” accuses the Australian Broadcasting Corporation of being “Anglophobic” and ignoring “antiwhite” racism — terms frequently associated with white nationalist rhetoric.

While the site claims a commitment to factual accuracy, it provides no citations, links, or evidence to support many of its claims. There is also no named editorial staff, and a policy allowing anonymous authorship, severely reducing transparency and accountability.

Failed Fact Checks

• While Major IFCN-certified organizations have not fact-checked the Noticer, its use of extreme bias, racialized language, and lack of transparent sourcing places it well within the “Low” Factual category.

Overall, we rate The Noticer as Far-Right Biased and questionable based on its consistent promotion of white nationalist talking points, racial animus, and anti-immigrant framing. We also rate it Low for factual reporting due to poor sourcing, anonymous authorship, lack of transparency, and inflammatory, misleading content. (D. Van Zandt 06/27/2025)

Source: https://www.noticer.news/

Last Updated on June 27, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check

---

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation

---

---

---

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources