LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate Splinter as left-biased based on story selection and editorial perspectives that favor the progressive left. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to one-sided reporting that may leave out important counterarguments.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT (-6.8)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (3.3)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Splinter News, initially launched as Fusion in 2013 under Univision Communications, became known as Splinter in 2017. The publication positioned itself with a strong left-leaning editorial stance, focused on progressive and socially conscious journalism. However, in 2019, under G/O Media’s management, Splinter ceased operations due to financial challenges and strategic shifts within its parent company.
In March 2024, Paste Magazine revived Splinter under new ownership, aiming to reestablish its voice in progressive journalism. Jacob Weindling was appointed as Editor-in-Chief, marking a fresh editorial era focused on challenging established political and economic power structures.
Read our profile on United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Splinter is currently owned by Paste Media Group, which acquired the brand in November 2023. Paste Media aims to integrate Splinter into its portfolio of progressive media assets, emphasizing a subscription-based funding model alongside traditional digital advertising.
Analysis / Bias
Splinter’s editorial stance remains strongly left-leaning and activist-oriented. The platform is known for its bold and often confrontational style, with articles frequently addressing issues of social justice, economic inequality, and political critique. Under Weindling’s leadership, Splinter continues its tradition of using assertive headlines and opinionated language. This unapologetic approach appeals to a politically engaged, progressive audience but may alienate readers with moderate or conservative views.
The publication sources its articles from progressive voices and affiliated outlets, similar to its prior affiliation with the Gizmodo Media Group. While generally reliable, Splinter’s content may rely on emotionally charged language, such as Tucker Carlson, Famed Truth Teller, Says He Was Mauled by a Demon, which can result in occasional criticism over sensationalism.
Editorially, all stories favor the left and frequently denigrate the right like this Forget the Polls, Early Voting Suggests Trump Is in Trouble and A Rally So Racist Even The Media Kings of Euphemism Had No Alternative. In general, Splinter holds progressive left biases and is reasonably factual; however, reporting is one-sided and leaves out context and counterarguments.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years.
Overall, we rate Splinter as left-biased based on story selection and editorial perspectives that favor the progressive left. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to one-sided reporting that may leave out important counterarguments. (M. Huitsing 10/9/2017) Updated (02/18/2025)
Source: https://www.splinter.com/
Last Updated on February 18, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources