Space Daily is rated Pro-Science with high factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, we rate Space Daily Pro-Science based on its consistent coverage of space exploration, astronomy, physics, planetary science, and research-based science communication. We rate it High for factual reporting due to transparent editorial standards, disclosed AI-assisted workflow, sourced scientific explanations, correction policy, named ownership, and a clean fact-check record.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE (-0.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: Australia
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Space Daily is an independent science and space news website founded in Tokyo in 1995 and now based in Australia. According to its About Us page, Space Daily covers three main areas: space industry news, science, and “Mind & Meaning,” which focuses on psychology, ambition, isolation, and human behavior under extreme conditions. The site covers launches, missions, satellites, defense, planetary science, climate science, physics, technology, space policy, and related human-interest topics.
Space Daily states that every published piece is editorially directed and reviewed before publication. It also discloses that AI tools are used to support drafting, research, and editing, but not to replace human judgment. The publication says factual claims are sourced and linked, quotations are attributed, images are credited when available, and corrections are handled through a dedicated corrections email.
Read our profile on the Australian media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Space Daily is operated by Brown Brothers Media. The site lists Justin Brown and Lachlan Brown as co-publishers, along with a small masthead of writers and contributors. Revenue is generated through display advertising, with Mediavine identified as the site’s advertising provider.
Analysis / Bias
Space Daily is rated Pro-Science because its content focuses on space exploration, astronomy, planetary science, physics, climate science, technology, and research-based explanations. It does not primarily publish political opinion, and its space and science reporting generally reflects mainstream scientific understanding.
For example, Saturn used to be listed with 83 moons. Then astronomers looked harder, found dozens more, and by 2026 the count had exploded to 285 explains how improved detection methods and survey work increased Saturn’s confirmed moon count. The article accurately distinguishes between Saturn gaining moons and astronomers becoming better at detecting small, faint, irregular moons. It also explains image stacking, confirmation through the Minor Planet Center, and the difference between major moons and small irregular satellites.
Similarly, NASA tested a nuclear rocket engine dozens of times in the 1960s, proved it could work, then shelved it before it ever flew provides a clear overview of Project Rover, NERVA, nuclear thermal propulsion, Mars transit advantages, and the modern DRACO program. The article explains technical concepts such as specific impulse and notes uncertainty around claims that nuclear propulsion would dramatically shorten Mars travel times, which demonstrates appropriate scientific caution.
Overall, Space Daily uses a science-forward editorial approach and generally presents complex space and science topics in accessible language. The site is transparent about AI-assisted production and editorial review, which is important given the potential for AI-generated errors. Some limitations include an ad-heavy layout, use of aggregated or rewritten material, and broad cross-promotion of related lifestyle or psychology content. However, the reviewed science articles are explanatory, sourced, and consistent with mainstream scientific understanding.
Failed Fact Checks
- None found by IFCN-approved fact-checkers.
Overall, we rate Space Daily Pro-Science based on its consistent coverage of space exploration, astronomy, physics, planetary science, and research-based science communication. We rate it High for factual reporting due to transparent editorial standards, disclosed AI-assisted workflow, sourced scientific explanations, correction policy, named ownership, and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 07/07/2026)
Source: https://spacedaily.com/
Last Updated on July 7, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources