LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate The San Francisco Standard as Left-Center Biased with a Mostly Factual reporting designation. The outlet demonstrates a commitment to factual accuracy but occasionally relies on circular referencing and anonymous sources, slightly diminishing the robustness of its reporting. Its story selection and framing often reflect progressive perspectives, aligning with the political leanings of its Bay Area audience.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.1)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.1)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The San Francisco Standard, established in 2021, delivers comprehensive coverage of Bay Area politics, culture, and lifestyle. Based in San Francisco, it aims to provide high-quality journalism on topics ranging from political investigations to lifestyle guides.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
The San Francisco Standard, originally launched as Here/Say Media in 2021, is funded by Crankstart, the philanthropic foundation of Michael Moritz and Harriet Heyman. Initially a nonprofit project, it transitioned into an independent, for-profit venture with a $10 million investment from Moritz and Heyman.
Analysis / Bias
The San Francisco Standard is a regional digital news outlet covering Bay Area politics, culture, and lifestyle, focusing on unique local stories. One such piece, Private Chefs for Silicon Valley’s Elite Spill the (precisely 70-degree) tea, uses anonymous interviews to emphasize the extravagant demands of Silicon Valley’s wealthy. The reliance on sensational anecdotes, such as exact tea temperatures or discarding most of a soda, creates a vivid but potentially skewed narrative. While entertaining, lacking named sources compromises the article’s factual reliability.
Another article, titled “Affordable housing in California is dealt another blow with Prop. 5 failure,” discusses the rejection of Proposition 5, which aimed to lower the voter approval threshold for local bonds funding affordable housing and public infrastructure. While the article references external sources like Ballotpedia for context, it also relies on internal links to previous coverage, potentially limiting the breadth of perspectives. This approach could affect the article’s comprehensiveness and objectivity by leaning on its own reporting rather than incorporating a wider range of external viewpoints.
Lastly, the article “SF braces for Trump’s return: ‘It’s a little triggering’ “ captures the reactions of San Francisco residents to the potential re-election of Donald Trump. It includes interviews with local political figures and citizens, highlighting concerns about the implications of a Trump presidency on the city’s governance and social policies. The language conveys apprehension and unease, reflecting the predominantly liberal stance of the city’s populace. While the article provides a snapshot of local sentiments, it primarily presents perspectives critical of Trump’s policies.
The SF Standard primarily relies on direct reporting, official sources, and local experts for information; while this approach supports credibility, its regional focus and editorial stance may influence the framing of topics, particularly those related to political and social issues.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate The San Francisco Standard as Left-Center Biased with a Mostly Factual reporting designation. The outlet demonstrates a commitment to factual accuracy but occasionally relies on circular referencing and anonymous sources, slightly diminishing the robustness of its reporting. Its story selection and framing often reflect progressive perspectives, aligning with the political leanings of its Bay Area audience. (M. Huitsing 11/15/2024)
Source: https://sfstandard.com/
Last Updated on November 15, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources