RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate React19 as Right-Center Biased due to its indirect criticism of public health agencies through vaccine injury testimonials, which often question the safety of vaccines. We rate its factual reporting as Mixed, as the site relies heavily on personal stories and selectively references data, focusing on adverse outcomes while potentially overlooking more comprehensive evidence supporting vaccine effectiveness.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
React19.org is a non-profit organization that supports individuals who have experienced adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. The organization focuses on advocacy and providing resources for those affected. Over time, React19 has also become involved in legal matters, most notably as a participant in filing amicus curiae briefs in significant court cases related to vaccine injuries.
In 2024, React19, alongside the Manhattan Institute and several vaccine-injured individuals, filed an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case Murthy v. Missouri, offering their expertise and insights to support the respondent. React19.org is headquartered in Texas.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
React19.org was founded by Brianne Dressen, Denise Malik, and Louie Traub. While the Supreme Court docket lists Denise Malik and Louie Traub as co-founders, the official React19.org About page only mentions Brianne Dressen and Joel Wallskog as co-chairmen. React19 is a non-profit organization funded through donations and fundraising campaigns to maintain its operations.
Analysis / Bias
React19 presents a critical perspective of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly highlighting adverse effects and advocating for more research and support for those impacted. This focus may lead to a Right-Centered to Anti-Vaccine Bias, as it challenges mainstream public health narratives promoting vaccine safety and efficacy.
React19 features numerous personal stories from individuals reporting adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines, and through these accounts, the site frequently criticizes public health agencies like the CDC and FDA. These injury stories, such as “Vaccine Injury Testimonial Michele Florman,” often express skepticism toward government transparency and vaccine safety claims, portraying the agencies as withholding crucial data. The website features numerous personal stories and case reports of vaccine injuries, which can evoke emotional responses and may influence readers’ perceptions of vaccine safety. The emphasis on adverse events without equivalent coverage of vaccine benefits or broader scientific consensus suggests a selective presentation of information.
React19.org also publishes stories offering more balanced perspectives, such as “His wife died from Johnson & Johnson Covid vaccine complications. Why he’s still pro-vaccine.” This republished article supports vaccination despite acknowledging vaccine-related harm. While the site focuses on vaccine injury awareness, it occasionally includes broader views on vaccination, though the emphasis remains predominantly on adverse effects.
Regarding sourcing, React19 references scientific studies and case reports, but these tend to highlight adverse outcomes, potentially overlooking vaccine safety and effectiveness studies. The language is emotive and advocacy-driven, using terms like “healing,” “vaccine injury,” and “complications” prominently featured, reinforcing a narrative of harm associated with vaccines.
The site emphasizes vaccine skepticism without fully presenting broader studies supporting vaccine safety, leading to a subtly right-leaning perspective.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate React19 as Right-Center Biased due to its indirect criticism of public health agencies through vaccine injury testimonials, which often question the safety of vaccines. We rate its factual reporting as Mixed, as the site relies heavily on personal stories and selectively references data, focusing on adverse outcomes while potentially overlooking more comprehensive evidence supporting vaccine effectiveness. (M. Huitsing 10/21/2024)
Source: https://react19.org/
Last Updated on October 21, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources