Open Letters from Anne Applebaum is rated Left-Center with Mostly Factual factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Open Letters, from Anne Applebaum Left-Center biased based on strongly anti-authoritarian, anti-Trump, pro-democracy, and liberal internationalist editorial framing. We rate the factual reporting as Mostly Factual due to generally credible sourcing and historical expertise, though coverage is heavily opinion-driven, selective in framing, and often advocacy-based rather than balanced journalism.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-4.8)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.6)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Open Letters, from Anne Applebaum is a Substack newsletter operated by Anne Applebaum, a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian, author, and staff writer for The Atlantic. Applebaum has spent decades covering Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, authoritarianism, democracy, and international politics. The newsletter focuses heavily on democratic decline, corruption, authoritarian movements, Russian influence, and criticism of populist and nationalist politics, particularly surrounding Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Open Letters, from Anne Applebaum, is independently operated by Anne Applebaum through the Substack platform. Revenue is generated primarily through paid newsletter subscriptions.
Analysis / Bias
The newsletter demonstrates a Left-Center editorial bias rooted in liberal internationalist, pro-democracy, and anti-authoritarian perspectives. Coverage strongly favors liberal democratic institutions, NATO, transatlantic alliances, and opposition to populist nationalism and authoritarian governments.
Applebaum frequently frames Trump-aligned politics as corrupt or authoritarian. For example, Kleptocracy Inc characterizes the Trump administration as moving toward oligarchy and kleptocracy while heavily emphasizing alleged corruption, conflicts of interest, and institutional decay. The piece relies substantially on aggregation and interpretation of other reporting sources rather than original investigative documentation.
Similarly, Trump Doesn’t Remember What He’s Done portrays Trump as strategically reckless and damaging to Western alliances, while Rise of the Trump Loyalists argues that civil service restructuring threatens democratic governance. These articles consistently present Trump and allied populist movements negatively.
Applebaum’s broader public commentary also reflects strong criticism of Russian foreign policy, nationalism, authoritarian governments, and right-wing populist movements. While critics, including some anti-interventionist commentators, have labeled her neoconservative or hawkish on foreign policy, her overall ideological framing aligns more closely with establishment liberal internationalism than traditional conservatism.
Factually, the newsletter generally relies on mainstream reporting, historical analysis, and verifiable public records. However, articles are frequently commentary-driven, interpretive, and advocacy-oriented rather than neutral reporting. Sourcing quality is generally solid but selective, often emphasizing evidence supporting anti-authoritarian and anti-Trump narratives without substantial ideological balance.
Failed Fact Checks
- None to date
Overall, we rate Open Letters, from Anne Applebaum Left-Center biased based on strongly anti-authoritarian, anti-Trump, pro-democracy, and liberal internationalist editorial framing. We rate the factual reporting as Mostly Factual due to generally credible sourcing and historical expertise, though coverage is heavily opinion-driven, selective in framing, and often advocacy-based rather than balanced journalism. (D. Van Zandt 05/11/2026)
Source: https://anneapplebaum.substack.com/
Last Updated on May 11, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources