LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate Notes from the Front Left Biased based on consistent criticism of conservative political figures and strong editorial framing opposing the Trump administration. We also rate the site as High in factual reporting due to strong sourcing from primary documents and a clean fact-check record.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT (-5.9)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Notes from the Front is a Substack newsletter written by attorney Anne P. Mitchell. According to the About page, Mitchell is a lawyer, law professor emeritus, legislative advisor, and author who began publishing the newsletter in 2025 to provide legal analysis and commentary about actions taken by the Trump administration. The publication focuses heavily on legal disputes, court rulings, and political developments that the author believes affect American democracy.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Notes from the Front is owned and operated by Anne P. Mitchell and published through the Substack platform. The newsletter is funded through subscriptions and paid memberships as described on the About page, typically priced at about $5 per month. According to Mitchell’s professional profile on LinkedIn, she is also an attorney, legislative advisor, and founder of the Institute for Social Internet Public Policy (ISIPP).
Analysis / Bias
Notes from the Front is a political commentary newsletter that presents legal and political developments through a strongly anti-Trump perspective.
For example, the article BAM! Court Smacks Down Noem in Her Effort to Refuse Congressional Representatives Unscheduled Access to Inspect Detention Facilities frames a court ruling against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem using celebratory and emotionally charged language.
Another article, I Have the 4th FBI Interview Implicating Trump!, promotes allegations about Donald Trump tied to Epstein-related investigations.
Additionally, Here is the Next Installment of the Maxwell Evidence Court Files I Found! 445 Pages Not in the DOJ Files! highlights documents from the Ghislaine Maxwell case while encouraging paid subscriptions to access additional materials and interpretations. The site frequently uses advocacy language describing legal developments as part of a “battle to save our democracy,” which reflects a clear ideological perspective and an editorial focus opposing the Trump administration. While the author usually references court documents and legal proceedings, reporting is largely interpretive commentary that favors a progressive perspective.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Notes from the Front Left Biased based on consistent criticism of conservative political figures and strong editorial framing opposing the Trump administration. We also rate the site as High in factual reporting due to strong sourcing from primary documents and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 03/08/2026)
Source: https://annepmitchell.substack.com/
Last Updated on March 8, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources