A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Failure to disclose Satire
Country: Unknown
History
Founded in 2014, Not Allowed To is a website that publishes shocking, humorous, clickbait type news about entertainment, celebrities, and politics. The website 100% lacks transparency as they do not offer an about page, disclosure of ownership, or authors. Further, many stories appear to be satire, but not labeled as such.
Funded by / Ownership
Not Allowed To does not disclose ownership and revenue is derived through advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Not Allowed To publishes clickbait news and headlines designed to be shared on social media. The stories on Not Allowed To are clearly not true and satirical, however, they never disclaim that they are, which forces us to rate them as questionable due to a lack of transparency. For example, this story MAN WHO DIED OF CORONAVIRUS MIRACULOUSLY RESURRECTS THREE DAYS LATER, is certainly 100% satire, but there is not an indication of such.
Overall, we rate Not Allowed To Questionable due to a complete lack of transparency regarding the content of the website and ownership. (D. Van Zandt 8/10/2017) Updated (7/11/2020)
Source: https://notallowedto.com/
Last Updated on December 8, 2020 by Media Bias Fact Check
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources
