RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate NZZ English as Right-Center biased due to its emphasis on conservative viewpoints, particularly in its economic and geopolitical coverage. It is rated Mostly Factual because, while it generally maintains factual reporting standards, some articles exhibit sourcing issues, making it difficult for readers to verify certain claims independently.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: Switzerland
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
The Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ), a Swiss German-language daily newspaper founded in 1780, is known for its comprehensive news coverage. The NZZ English edition aims to provide international readers with analytical and in-depth reporting akin to its German-language counterpart. Further, The NZZ media group includes the daily newspaper NZZ, several magazines, and a 35% stake in the regional media joint venture CH Media. Felix Graf is the CEO of NZZ.
Read our profile on Switzerland’s media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
NZZ Mediengruppe, a major Swiss media company, owns NZZ. The newspaper generates revenue through subscriptions, advertising, and digital services.
Analysis / Bias
The NZZ media group identifies itself as having a liberal perspective, which in the European context often aligns with right-leaning economic policies, emphasizing free markets, individual liberties, and limited government intervention, which differs from the left-leaning interpretation of liberalism in the United States. NZZ English exhibits a Center-Right bias in its national and international coverage, especially in its economic and political reporting. For instance, the interview with Mike Pompeo, titled “President Trump’s task will be to restore deterrence,” provides a platform for Pompeo to extensively share his viewpoints on foreign policy and national security under President Trump. The interview presents Pompeo’s views without much critical analysis or opposing perspectives, reinforcing a conservative narrative. The focus on restoring deterrence aligns with a hawkish, right-leaning stance on foreign policy.
Another article skews the narrative towards sensationalism as “Secret dossiers show that a Swiss Nazi banker tried to assassinate Henry Kissinger in 1973 to block peace – twice,” presents speculative interpretations of historical events, such as Kissinger’s motivations and actions during the Yom Kippur War, often without concrete evidence to support these claims.
Another example is the article “How the US and its allies are trying to dissuade China from invading Taiwan,” which explores the geopolitical strategies of the US and its allies in countering China’s influence in Taiwan. The language used, such as “dissuade” and “invading,” emphasizes a strong adversarial stance towards China, consistent with a Center-Right perspective that prioritizes strong defense policies and international alliances. The framing positions Western actions positively while portraying China as a clear aggressor.
Furthermore, in the context of Swiss politics, the article “Nothing Left to Lose: Behind Switzerland’s Rising Petty Crime Rates Lie Stories of migrant misery” details individual stories of North African migrants involved in petty crimes. By naming offenders (changed names) and describing their criminal activities, the article emphasizes the issue of migrant crime, which can imply a need for stricter immigration policies. While it mentions the difficult circumstances faced by the migrants, the focus on crime and the question of police control align with a narrative that supports stricter immigration enforcement.
Regarding sourcing, NZZ articles sometimes lack citations, making verification challenging. The use of changed names and limited direct references can affect perceived transparency. Additionally, NZZ generally exhibits a Center-Right bias through selective story framing and emphasis on conservative viewpoints, particularly in economic and geopolitical coverage.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate NZZ English as Right-Center biased due to its emphasis on conservative viewpoints, particularly in its economic and geopolitical coverage. It is rated Mostly Factual because, while it generally maintains factual reporting standards, some articles exhibit sourcing issues, making it difficult for readers to verify certain claims independently. (M. Huitsing 06/07/2024)
Source: https://www.nzz.ch/
Last Updated on June 7, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources