Medical Dialogues – Bias and Credibility

Medical Dialogues is rated  least biased with  high factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

---

LEAST BIASED

History

Medical Dialogues is an Indian medical news, health information, and fact-checking website founded in 2015 by health researcher Meghna A. Singhania and cardiologist Dr. Prem Aggarwal. According to its About page, the site is intended for healthcare professionals and the public, covering medical news, healthcare policy, medical education, pharmaceutical news, clinical research, hospital news, medical technology, and health misinformation. The website lists its parent company as Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt. Ltd., based in New Delhi, India, with Meghna A. Singhania serving as editor-in-chief.

Read our profile on the Indian media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Medical Dialogues is owned and operated by Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered in India. The website states that it relies primarily on advertising revenue and maintains that advertisements are separated from editorial content. It also discloses editorial contacts, ownership information, corporate registration details, editorial policies, advertising policies, and a corrections process.

Analysis / Bias

Medical Dialogues generally reports with minimal political bias and focuses primarily on healthcare, medical education, clinical research, hospitals, pharmaceuticals, and public health. Its content is written for a medical and healthcare audience and typically relies on named sources, official statements, clinical studies, medical experts, government agencies, and peer-reviewed research.

For example, ANIIMS grants summer vacation to teaching faculty after uproar over no leaves is a straightforward medical education and state-level healthcare administration article. The language is generally neutral and focused on institutional decisions affecting faculty members.

Medical research coverage is also evidence-based. In Safety and Effectiveness of Vedolizumab in Indian Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results from a Phase 4 Study, Medical Dialogues summarizes clinical study findings and presents research details in a professional medical news format.

The site also operates a dedicated fact-checking unit focused on health and medical misinformation. For example, Fact Check: Can methi and ajwain regulate irregular periods within five days? examines a viral health claim and rates it against available medical evidence and expert input. Medical Dialogues is a verified signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), which supports its credibility and adherence to fact-checking transparency standards.

Overall, Medical Dialogues demonstrates strong sourcing, transparent ownership, clear editorial policies, and a focus on evidence-based medical information. Its primary limitation is that some content includes industry, pharma, and healthcare-sector reporting that may require readers to distinguish between news, sponsored material, and clinical summaries. However, the site generally labels advertising and maintains professional editorial standards.

Failed Fact Checks

• None found.

Overall, we rate Medical Dialogues Least Biased based on its nonpartisan focus on medical news, healthcare policy, clinical research, and fact-checking rather than political advocacy. We rate it High for factual reporting due to transparent ownership, strong sourcing, medical expert input, evidence-based reporting, and IFCN verification. (D. Van Zandt 06/19/2026)

Source: https://medicaldialogues.in/

Last Updated on June 19, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources