A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.
Bias: Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News
According to the MagaPill about page: “MAGAPILL is here to ensure that President Trump’s Legacy is properly documented. It’s been recently reported that 95% of the News Media’s coverage of Trump is Negative, while only 5% is positive. This is the definition of an unfair bias and one of the main reasons why everyday American’s confidence in the “Main Stream” media is at an all time low.”
Funded by / Ownership
MagaPill does not disclose ownership and the website is funded through online advertising and donations.
Analysis / Bias
In review, the MagaPill website consists of links to archived news stories that highlight Donald Trump’s accomplishments as President. For the most part they link to mainstream news sources, however they also often to link to the Alt-Right website Breitbart, which has a poor track record with fact checkers. MagaPill has also been highlighted as a fake news, conspiracy website by the credible conservative Weekly Standard. MagaPill frequently uses their Twitter account to promote conspiracy theories such as the Seth Rich Murder.
A factual search reveals a failed fact check.
Overall, this is a Questionable source based on promotion of one sided Donald Trump propaganda, debunked conspiracy theories and some false claims. (D. Van Zandt 11/27/2017) Updated (10/14/2018)
We signed the Pro-Truth Pledge:
please hold us accountable.
Ads do not necessarily reflect the views of MBFC