LivPost – Bias and Credibility

LivPost - Right-Center Bias - Conservative - Credible and reliableFactual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


RIGHT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.

  • Overall, we rate LivPost as Right-Center biased based on moderate criticism of the Labour Party policies. We also rate them as High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.7)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.0)
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

LivPost is a digital local news outlet based in Liverpool, England. Launched in the early 2020s, it serves readers across Merseyside with short-form reporting on civic affairs, business, politics, and culture. According to its About page, the team consists of local journalists and community contributors committed to delivering “quality journalism” focused on the region. 

Read our profile on the United Kingdom media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

LivPost monetizes through a blend of reader contributions (invited via its “Give the gift of quality journalism” drive), optional subscriptions, and display advertising embedded in articles. There are no corporate backers listed, and the outlet emphasizes its independence and local ownership.

Analysis / Bias

LivPost reports are well-sourced and fact-based, but story selection and framing suggest a modest right-of-center bias, particularly in how local governance under Labour is portrayed. For instance, the article “Why are companies leaving Liverpool?” discusses business flight from the city and implicitly connects it to local economic policies without naming alternative political or structural contributors.

In “Blame trains and trams on wheels: how Liverpool fared in Labour’s spending review”, the title and tone frame Labour’s transportation spending as inadequate and highlight bureaucratic inefficiencies. Another piece, “Special Investigation: The Collapsing…”, investigates public infrastructure decay under a Labour-led council, but does not reference comparable projects in non-Labour regions, thereby limiting the broader political context. While none of these stories are overtly partisan or inflammatory, they consistently position Labour leadership as ineffective or flawed. The absence of equivalent scrutiny of Conservative policies or voices further supports a slight editorial lean. Despite this, all articles are well written, cite official sources, and avoid emotional language.



Failed Fact Check

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate LivPost as Right-Center biased based on moderate criticism of the Labour Party policies. We also rate them as High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 06/19/2025)

Source: https://www.livpost.co.uk/

Last Updated on June 19, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: