Journalistic Revolution – Bias and Credibility

Journalistic Revolution - Conspiracy - Fake News - Conservative - Not CredibleJournalisticRevolution.com - Pseudoscience - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Very Low - Biased - Not Credible - Fake News


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Journalistic Revolution as Extreme Right based on its anti-government ideology, anarcho-libertarian perspective, and strong promotion of conspiracy narratives. We rate it Low for factual reporting due to its reliance on pseudoscience, disinformation, and deeply unsubstantiated claims.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.5)
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (10.0)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Journalistic Revolution is a conspiracy-oriented, libertarian-leaning website promoting a wide range of anti-government, anti-vaccine, and pro-anarchist content. According to their About page, the site describes itself as a “platform for truth, honesty, and freedom” that opposes centralized government, organized religion, and public health policy. The site claims to promote liberty through “peaceful noncompliance” and supports a worldview rooted in libertarian anarchism.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

The website appears to be independently operated by an anonymous team or individual. It generates revenue through display ads and book/merchandise sales, although no formal store is visible. There is no donation page or formal funding transparency. Much of the content encourages viewers to disengage from state institutions and mainstream media.

Analysis / Bias

Journalistic Revolution exhibits an Extreme Right bias, with strong libertarian and anarcho-capitalist overtones. The site promotes conspiracy theories, medical misinformation, and anti-establishment rhetoric. For example, the article “COVID1984: A Plandemic Love Story” accuses the government and media of fabricating the COVID-19 pandemic, framing it as a coordinated plan to impose tyranny. Another post, “To Vaccinate or Not to Vaccinate: Informed Consent”, casts doubt on the safety and necessity of vaccines, a common talking point among anti-vaccine activists and disinformation groups.

In an article on finance, “Conspiracy Theory: Government and Central Banking Lies About Bitcoin”, the site accuses Federal Reserve officials and JPMorgan of fraud and conspiracy, without providing verifiable evidence. Much of the content blends anti-bank populism with pseudoeconomics and unproven legal theories.



A core ideological anchor of the site is found in “Why I Am a Libertarian and Anarchist”, which asserts that all forms of government are illegitimate and promotes anarchy as the morally superior alternative to democracy.

Their list of “Stay Active” partners and sources further reinforces the ideological and conspiratorial nature of the site. These include:

Although some cited groups (e.g., Cato Institute) occasionally produce scholarly content, the overwhelming editorial direction of Journalistic Revolution is conspiratorial and pseudoscientific.

Failed Fact Checks

  • There are no known fact checks directly tied to the Journalistic Revolution; however, many sites it links to and amplifies, such as Children’s Health Defense and LewRockwell.com, have long histories of promoting false or misleading information. Its COVID and financial content contradict the scientific consensus and mainstream economics.

Overall, we rate Journalistic Revolution as Extreme Right based on its anti-government ideology, anarcho-libertarian perspective, and strong promotion of conspiracy narratives. We rate it Low for factual reporting due to its reliance on pseudoscience, disinformation, and deeply unsubstantiated claims. (D. Van Zandt 05/10/2025)

Source: https://journalisticrevolution.com/

Last Updated on May 10, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: