JoJoFromJerz – Bias and Credibility

JoJofromJerz - Left Bias - Liberal - Progressive - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

  • Overall, JoJoFromJerz (Are you f’ng kidding me?) is a strongly Left-biased, reader-funded opinion and commentary Substack that blends political activism, satire, and personal essays. While it sometimes references real events, its one-sided framing, emotive rhetoric, and inconsistent sourcing result in a Mixed factual rating.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT (-7.9)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.0)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

JoJoFromJerz is a political commentary newsletter on Substack titled “Are you f’ng kidding me?” According to the About page, the publication is written and produced by Joanne Carducci, widely known online as “JoJoFromJerz,” a New Jersey–based social media personality who rose to prominence on Twitter/X through sharp, profane anti-Trump commentary. The Substack launched as an outlet for long-form writing, audio podcasts, and subscriber discussions that Carducci states she could not fully pursue on mainstream social platforms.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

JoJoFromJerz is independently owned and operated by Joanne Carducci. Funding comes primarily from paid Substack subscriptions and related audio podcast content, including the Sane(ish) with Jo Carducci podcast. Carducci explicitly states that paid subscriptions help support her family, framing the project as a reader-funded, individual operation rather than a corporate media outlet. She also contributes opinion pieces to outlets such as The Daily Beast.

Analysis / Bias

JoJoFromJerz is an openly partisan, progressive opinion platform. Content is highly ideological, rhetorically aggressive, and designed to persuade rather than neutrally inform. Articles and podcast episodes routinely characterize conservative figures and institutions using inflammatory language, with framing that presumes malicious intent rather than weighing competing interpretations.

For example, the podcast and article ICE Keeps Murdering Americans & Kidnapping Children asserts systemic criminal behavior by ICE and the Trump administration, presenting anecdotal cases and whistleblower claims in a moral narrative rather than a strictly evidentiary framework. Similarly, “Pedophile Protector” is a polemical essay that uses mockery and personal attacks to condemn Donald Trump, with little attempt at balance or neutral sourcing.



Even when Carducci argues for constitutional norms, such as in You Don’t Get to Break the Constitution Just Because the Bastard Had It Coming, the analysis remains rooted in strongly emotive language and explicit partisan positioning. While some arguments reference real events and public records, sourcing is inconsistent and often secondary to commentary, satire, and personal moral judgment.

Failed Fact Checks

  • No failed fact checks by IFCN-approved organizations were identified. However, the outlet frequently makes broad or absolutist claims (e.g., about law enforcement, immigration authorities, or executive intent) without rigorous sourcing, which increases the risk of overstatement or factual imprecision.

Overall, JoJoFromJerz (Are you f’ng kidding me?) is a strongly Left-biased, reader-funded opinion and commentary Substack that blends political activism, satire, and personal essays. While it sometimes references real events, its one-sided framing, emotive rhetoric, and inconsistent sourcing result in a Mixed factual rating. (D. Van Zandt 01/29/2026)

Source: https://jojofromjerz.substack.com/

Last Updated on January 29, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: