LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Genocide Watch as Left-Center Biased due to its consistent focus on human rights, racial justice, refugee advocacy, and systemic violence. We rate it as High for factual reporting based on well-sourced content, academic grounding, and issue-driven reporting on genocide prevention and international law.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-3.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Genocide Watch is a U.S.-based nonprofit organization founded in 1999 by Dr. Gregory Stanton, a former U.S. State Department official and author of the “Ten Stages of Genocide” model. The organization is headquartered in New Jersey and focuses on early warning signs and the prevention of genocide and mass atrocities. It maintains a global monitoring system and issues “Country Reports by Region” based on risk assessments, which include alerts, briefings, and research on human rights violations.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Genocide Watch is a nonprofit organization under 501(c)(3), governed by a Board of Directors listed on its leadership page. The organization states that it is funded through private donations, foundation grants, and occasional speaking honoraria. It does not accept commercial advertising and is not part of a larger corporate entity. Genocide Watch’s annual report is a narrative program summary, not a financial statement, and the group does not publish Form 990s or audited accounts, so detailed funding sources and amounts remain undisclosed.
Analysis / Bias
Genocide Watch consistently covers topics such as racism, anti-Semitism, forced deportations, homophobia, and state-sponsored violence, which aligns with themes often emphasized by outlets on the left or left-center of the spectrum. For example, the organization condemned attacks on Asian-American and Pacific Islander communities. Additionally, it issued a warning about the risks of mass violence in the U.S. in a Red Flag Alert.
It also republished a New York Times article on Stephen Miller, a Trump-era architect of immigration policies, suggesting a critical stance toward hardline immigration policies. While the organization focuses on human rights and genocide prevention globally, its emphasis on systemic oppression, refugee protection, and racial justice reflects a progressive perspective. Articles are generally well-sourced, often citing or republishing credible international news outlets, UN reports, and academic studies; however, some opinion-based advocacy content is also present.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Genocide Watch as Left-Center Biased due to its consistent focus on human rights, racial justice, refugee advocacy, and systemic violence. We rate it as High for factual reporting based on well-sourced content, academic grounding, and issue-driven reporting on genocide prevention and international law. (M. Huitsing 07/12/2025)
Source: https://www.genocidewatch.com/
Last Updated on July 12, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources