Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Overall, we rate Faith Panda as a Moderate Pseudoscience website for the promotion of miracle cures.
Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Founded in 2016 and based in Kenya, “Faith Panda is a media startup that was created for the sole purpose of sharing inspirational and captivating stories around the world.” This website does have a medical dislcaimer that recommends consulting a doctor in lieu of their medical advice. The domain is registered to Jack Panaito.
Read our profile on Kenya’s media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Faith Panda does not disclose ownership on the website; however, the domain is registered to Jack Panaito. Faith Panda is funded through online advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Faith Panda is a health and homeopathic news blog that occasionally promotes pseudoscience. Many articles detail miracle cures through foods and incredible preventative properties that are not supported by science. They also have stories of miracle cures through prayer. Faith Panda spreads fear of GMOs that is not supported by the consensus of scientists. While there are many articles that contain sound information, such as advocating for vaccinating children, there are many more that are not scientifically based.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Faith Panda as a Moderate Pseudoscience website for promoting miracle cures. (D. Van Zandt 8/2/2017) Updated (10/14/2022)
Last Updated on May 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources