CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Overall, we rate Era of Light as a conspiracy-pseudoscience source due to its promotion of unverified spiritual messages, conspiracy theories, and alternative health misinformation. We rate its reporting as Very-Low in factual accuracy, as most of its content lacks independent verification, credible sources, or scientific backing.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (7.5)
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.5)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Era of Light is an alternative media website that publishes content on spirituality, esoteric beliefs, alternative health, astrology, and conspiracy theories. It features sections such as “Channelings,” “Disclosure,” and “News,” often presenting unverifiable claims about extraterrestrials, secret government programs, and metaphysical topics. The site does not provide clear information about its editorial team, ownership, or funding.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Era of Light does not disclose its ownership or funding sources. The site lacks transparency regarding its financial backing and does not appear to operate on a subscription model. It includes donation requests, suggesting reliance on reader contributions.
Analysis / Bias
Era of Light primarily publishes content focused on spiritual and metaphysical topics, often featuring “channelings” from entities such as the “9D Pleiadian Collective,” “The Federation of Light,” and “Master Kuthumi.” These articles claim to deliver messages from higher-dimensional beings but lack verifiable sources or scientific backing.
In addition to esoteric and spiritual content, the site promotes conspiracy theories and alternative health claims. For example, the article “Bird Flu Is a Rerun of the Covid Playbook” suggests that public health measures related to bird flu follow a pre-planned agenda, a common conspiracy narrative. Another article, “Trump AG Pam Bondi Says Epstein, Diddy, JFK, MLK Docs On Her Desk & Will Be Released Soon,” amplifies unverified claims about government cover-ups without credible sourcing.
The site also features articles, such as “DOGE Saves Taxpayers $55 Billion in Under a Month, Exposing Biden-Era Waste”, reports that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, has identified $55 billion in federal savings within a month. The article frames the Trump administration positively by crediting its Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with uncovering and eliminating significant government waste.
While Era of Light includes some science-labeled sections, such as “Health” and “Science,” its content frequently contradicts mainstream scientific consensus. Articles like “New Study Confirms Health Benefits of Coconut Oil and USDA False Claims Against It” challenge established nutritional science without substantial evidence.
Given its reliance on unverifiable sources, esoteric claims, and promotion of conspiracy theories, Era of Light lacks journalistic credibility and falls into the category of pseudoscience and misinformation.
Failed Fact Checks
- None by a third-party fact checker.
Overall, we rate Era of Light as a conspiracy-pseudoscience source due to its promotion of unverified spiritual messages, conspiracy theories, and alternative health misinformation. We rate its reporting as Very-Low in factual accuracy, as most of its content lacks independent verification, credible sources, or scientific backing. (M. Huitsing 02/24/2025)
Source: https://eraoflight.com/
Last Updated on February 24, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources
