Creation-Evolution Headlines

Creation-Evolution Headlines - Pseudoscience - Right Bias - Conservative - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation are recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Creation-Evolution Headlines as a right-biased pseudoscience website based on the political affiliation of its content and Low for factual reporting due to the promotion of creationism, which often contradicts established scientific consensus, and for the routine dissemination of pseudoscience and misinformation.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

CREV.info, also known as Creation-Evolution Headlines, is a website that publishes articles from a creationist perspective. The site critiques and analyzes scientific findings, news, and studies through the lens of creationism. The website is based in California.

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

David F. Coppedge is the founder and editor of the website, which is sponsored by the Master Plan Association, a California non-profit corporation. Donations generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

CREV.info publishes content that is critical of evolutionary theory and supportive of intelligent design and creationism. The site often challenges mainstream scientific consensus and presents alternative viewpoints that align with creationist beliefs.

CREV.info has articles that critique the scientific method and accuse mainstream science of bias against creationist viewpoints. The site also discusses topics that are often associated with pseudoscience, such as questioning the validity of psychoanalyzing aliens and critiquing the trust in science as potentially leading to gullibility. While not explicitly promoting conspiracy theories, the site’s content may align with certain conspiracy theory narratives by challenging widely accepted scientific facts.



Politically, Creation-Evolution Headlines strongly supports a conservative perspective with articles like this Big Science Is a Subsidiary of Socialists and Global Leftists. This article strongly favors the right while denigrating the left by accusing the “Big Science Cartel” of promoting leftist and socialist ideologies, censoring conservative viewpoints, and being anti-religious. It portrays the scientific community as uniformly aligned with Democratic Party talking points and hostile to conservative, traditional, and theistic values.

The website also promotes debunked pseudoscience like vaccines causing autism: Autism: Another Example of Evolution Misleading Science with Tragic Results and the consensus of science on evolution Nazi Medicine Inspired by Darwin. In general, Creation-Evolution Headlines is an anti-science organization that routinely promotes misinformation regarding science and discoveries.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None by a third-party fact checker; however, they routinely reject the consensus of science on most issues.

Overall, we rate Creation-Evolution Headlines as a right-biased pseudoscience website based on the political affiliation of its content and  Low for factual reporting due to the promotion of creationism, which often contradicts established scientific consensus, and for the routine dissemination of pseudoscience and misinformation. (D. Van Zandt 06/26/2024)

Source: https://crev.info/

Last Updated on June 26, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: