CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Overall, we rate Brutal Proof as Right Biased Conspiracy–Pseudoscience based on its promotion of extreme, antisemitic conspiracy theories and its use of inflammatory, dehumanizing language presented as fact. We also rate them Very Low in factual reporting due to the complete absence of credible sourcing, total lack of transparency, and repeated publication of demonstrably false and dangerous claims.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE (9.5)
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (10.0)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Brutal Proof is an anonymous website that publishes extreme conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and ideologically driven content. The site does not provide an about page, ownership information, editorial standards, mission statement, or staff disclosures. Articles are typically attributed only to “Admin,” offering no accountability or transparency.
Location: Unknown
Funded by / Ownership
The ownership and funding of Brutal Proof are completely undisclosed. There is no information regarding who operates the site, how it is funded, or where it is based. This lack of transparency is a major red flag and is typical of conspiracy and disinformation websites.
Analysis / Bias
Brutal Proof publishes content that is conspiratorial, antisemitic, and deeply rooted in pseudoscience. For example, the article “The CIA Manipulated to Have Their Top Mind Control Psychiatric Criminals Placed into Top Positions Because…” claims, without evidence, that the CIA, British intelligence, and global elites systematically rape children to create “mind-controlled slaves.” The author explicitly states, “I don’t need to provide links here,” demonstrating outright rejection of basic journalistic standards.
Another article, “MOSSAD ASSASSINATED MICHAEL JACKSON AS HE WAS A LOOSE CANNON”, alleges that Israeli intelligence controls the music industry and murdered Michael Jackson. The piece relies on fabricated “confessions” and antisemitic conspiracy tropes, with no evidence provided.
Similarly, “Harrowing Testimony From Severely Traumatized Poppy Raped Rothschilds” and “U.S. Gov’t Endorses Sick Sodomites; We Are Beyond Hope” use dehumanizing language, religious extremism, and unfounded accusations to vilify groups and institutions. Tags such as “Synagogue of Satan,” “Satanic Illuminati Criminals,” and “Zionism” are repeatedly used to frame a global conspiracy narrative.
The site consistently promotes long-debunked conspiracies involving satanic ritual abuse, global Jewish control, and secret intelligence cabals, all presented as unquestionable truth. There is no distinction between opinion, speculation, and fact.
Failed Fact Checks
- The claims made by Brutal Proof align with numerous conspiracy theories that have been repeatedly debunked by all major fact-checking organizations. The volume and severity of misinformation place this source firmly in the Very Low factual category.
Overall, we rate Brutal Proof as Right Biased Conspiracy–Pseudoscience based on its promotion of extreme, antisemitic conspiracy theories and its use of inflammatory, dehumanizing language presented as fact. We also rate them Very Low in factual reporting due to the complete absence of credible sourcing, total lack of transparency, and repeated publication of demonstrably false and dangerous claims. (D. Van Zandt 02/01/2026)
Source: https://brutalproof.net/
Last Updated on February 1, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources
