Daily Source Bias Check: American Lung Association

American Lung Association - Pro Science - Evidence Based - Credible - Left Biased

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate the American Lung Association Pro-Science based on support for the consensus of science. We also rate them Left-Center biased based on political advocacy that slightly favors the left.

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE/LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Source: https://www.lung.org/

Read Detailed Report

Video Advertisement

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

NFN-Low Biased Factual News


Subscribe With Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 21,691 other subscribers


Be the first to comment on "Daily Source Bias Check: American Lung Association"

Comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.