These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased sources.
- Overall, we rate Scoopnest Least Biased based on story selection but mixed for factual reporting due to the use of poor sources that fail fact checks.
Factual Reporting: MIXED
World Press Freedom Rank: France 29/180
Founded in 2016, Scoopnest is an online service that collects news “tweets” from a wide range of sources. They also provide the ability to filter by topics such as politics or health, etc.
Funded by / Ownership
Scoopnest does not reveal ownership on the website. Revenue is derived through advertising.
Analysis / Bias
Scoopnest curates/aggregates news from Twitter using a variety of sources. Including major media sources as well as individuals with a strong presence on Twitter. In a case like this, we review the sources utilized to determine bias. We first looked under the politics category and found Donald Trump’s Twitter account featured as well as Hilary Clinton and a range of left and right leaning politicians. Under the “News” tab we found the left-leaning BBC, MSNBC, and New York Times. We also found right-leaning sources such as Newsmax, Michelle Malkin, and the NRA. Some of these sources are listed as Questionable by MBFC. In general, Scoopnest does not appear to be biased, but rather publishes any news that is trending on Twitter. Based on this we rate them Least Biased but Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of poor sources.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Scoopnest Least Biased based on story selection but mixed for factual reporting due to the use of poor sources that fail fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 12/9/2016) Updated (12/16/2020)