The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 11/21/2020

Each day Media Bias Fact Check selects and publishes fact checks from around the world. We only utilize fact-checkers that are either a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) or have been verified as credible by MBFC. Further, we review each fact check for accuracy before publishing. (D. Van Zandt)

Claim Codes: Red = Fact Check on a Right Claim, Blue = Fact Check on a Left Claim, Black = Not Political/Conspiracy/Pseudoscience/Other

Claim by Sidney Powell: “Smartmatic and Dominion systems … were built to do this very thing, for changing the results of elections.”

PolitiFact rating: Pants on Fire

Trump lawyer falsely claims voting technology companies were created for changing election results

Claim by Joy Reid: Moderna and Pfizer “were not involved in Operation Warp Speed.”

Check Your Fact rating: False

FACT CHECK: MSNBC’s Joy Reid Claims Moderna And Pfizer ‘Were Not Involved In Operation Warp Speed’

Claim by Rand Paul: “Naturally acquired COVID-19 99.9982% percent effective.” rating: Misleading

Paul Misleads on Natural Infection and COVID-19 Vaccines

Claim by Joe Biden (D): The law governing the transition of presidential power “doesn’t require there to be an absolute winner. It says the ‘apparent’ winner.”

PolitiFact rating: Mostly True

Is Joe Biden right that transition starts with an ‘apparent’ winner?

Claim by Just Facts Daily: Joe Biden received extra votes in battleground states from noncitizens

USA Today rating: Unproven

Fact check: Claim that voting noncitizens affected 2020 election outcome is unverified

Just Facts Daily Rating

(International: India) Claim: Post claims that Mamata Banerjee, Naveen Patnaik, Amit Shah, Nitish Kumar and other ministers are discussing about Bengal elections over breakfast.

BOOM rating: False

Old Picture Of Amit Shah, Mamata Banerjee Meeting Naveen Patnaik Over Lunch In Odisha Shared In The Context Of Upcoming Bengal Elections

Disclaimer: We are providing links to fact checks by third-party fact-checkers. If you do not agree with a fact check, please directly contact the source of that fact check.

Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 


MBFC Donation

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

Subscribe With Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22.9K other subscribers

1 Comment on "The Latest Fact Checks curated by Media Bias Fact Check 11/21/2020"

  1. You need to fact check the reliability and political leanings of your so-called “fact checkers” before you use them as your source to make your claims. Their credibility is questionable at best so relying on them compromises your credibility. Calling yourself a “fact checker” does not automatically make your information factual or reliable. Fact checkers are typically inherently biased so you need to require them to back their “fact checking” with provable and verifiable evidence. Most of your posted disputed claims are from the right which shows your obvious bias. Shame on you.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.