Daily Source Bias Check: The Skeptic’s Dictionary

The Skeptic's Dictionary - Pro Science - Credible

Factual Reporting: Very High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate The Skeptic’s Dictionary a strong pro-science source that always sources to credible information. We also rate them Very-High for factual reporting for the same reasons.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Founded in 1994, The Skeptic’s Dictionary provides definitions, arguments, and essays on subjects such as the supernatural, occult, paranormal, and pseudoscientific. The Skeptic’s Dictionary is a collection of cross-referenced skeptical essays by Robert Todd Carroll, published on his website skepdic.com and in a printed book. The website contains 850 entries edited by a former professor, atheist, and skeptic Robert Todd Carroll (1945–2016).

Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership



The website was owned by Robert Todd Carroll until his passing in 2016. The website remains online and generates revenue through the sale of his books.

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Skeptic’s Dictionary is a website and a book that has entries on pseudoscientific, occult, paranormal, and other pseudoscientific beliefs in an encyclopedic order. For example, click on Chemtails and you will get a history of the conspiracy and then a proper debunking with numerous credible citations to support the author. In general, The Skeptic’s Dictionary is timeless and a necessary resource for debunking conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate The Skeptic’s Dictionary a strong pro-science source that always sources to credible information. We also rate them Very-High for factual reporting for the same reasons. (D. Van Zandt 8/19/2016) Updated (8/1/2020)

Source: http://www.skepdic.com/


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

Subscribe With Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22.9K other subscribers



Be the first to comment on "Daily Source Bias Check: The Skeptic’s Dictionary"

Comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.