The Supreme Court on Friday declined to hear a case on an Alabama law that outlawed a common form of abortion, allowing lower court orders blocking the law to remain in place.
Alabama had sought to overturn lower court rulings that struck down the ban on the abortion procedure, but the justices rejected that bid in their order.
Full Story @ The Hill
★ SUPPORT OUR MISSION
MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.
No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.
Starting at $3 /month — ad-free + exclusive content
- Remove all ads instantly
- Support independent ratings
- Cancel any time — no strings
Membership removes ads • Donations do not
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that he agreed the court should not hear the case, but called it a “stark reminder that our abortion jurisprudence has spiraled out of control.”
“Although this case does not present the opportunity to address our demonstrably erroneous ‘undue burden’ standard, we cannot continue blinking the reality of what this court has wrought,” Thomas wrote.
u̾n̾t̾i̾l̾ I̾ s̾a̾w̾ t̾h̾e̾ c̾h̾e̾c̾k̾ o̾v̾ $5̾6̾3̾4̾ , I̾ d̾i̾d̾ n̾0t̾ b̾e̾l̾i̾e̾v̾e̾ t̾h̾a̾t̾…m̾y̾… c̾0u̾s̾i̾n̾ h̾a̾d̾ b̾e̾e̾n̾ t̾r̾u̾l̾l̾y̾ r̾e̾c̾e̾i̾v̾i̾n̾g̾ m̾o̾n̾e̾y̾ p̾a̾r̾t̾-t̾i̾m̾e̾ a̾t̾ t̾h̾e̾r̾e̾ l̾a̾b̾t̾o̾p̾. . t̾h̾e̾r̾e̾ u̾n̾c̾l̾e̾ h̾a̾s̾ d̾o̾n̾e̾ t̾h̾i̾s̾ 4̾ l̾e̾s̾s̾ t̾h̾a̾n̾ s̾i̾x̾ m̾on̾t̾h̾s̾ a̾n̾d̾ j̾u̾s̾t̾ t̾o̾o̾k̾ c̾a̾r̾e̾ o̾f̾ t̾h̾e̾ m̾0r̾t̾g̾a̾g̾e̾ 0n̾ t̾h̾e̾i̾r̾ a̾p̾p̾a̾r̾t̾m̾e̾n̾t̾ a̾n̾d̾ b̾o̾u̾g̾h̾t̾ R̾e̾n̾a̾u̾l̾t̾ 5̾ . p̾0p̾ 0v̾e̾r̾ t̾o̾ t̾h̾i̾s̾ w̾e̾b̾s̾i̾t̾e̾ ===>>>>> Maxprofit10.com
Hi there, Thank you so much for sharing informative information with us.