CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Overall, we rate What Really Happened far-right biased and a Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy and Quackery Level Pseudoscience website based on the near-constant promotion of false and misleading information.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Founded in 1999, What Really Happened is a news and opinion blog that is dedicated 100% to the promotion of right-wing conspiracies and pseudoscience. The website lacks transparency as it does not offer an about page or clearly describe ownership.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
Michael Rivero owns What Really Happened. He is a podcaster, actor, and director. Advertising and a shop that sells merchandise generate revenue.
Analysis / Bias
They cover all the usual: The Clinton body count, false flags, global warming denial, Jewish Banker conspiracy, Vince Foster, 9-11, etc. There is not much else to say here other than it must be seen to be believed. Finally, if you really want to know “what really happened?” this would be the last site to visit.
Overall, we rate What Really Happened far-right biased and a Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy and Quackery Level Pseudoscience website based on the near-constant promotion of false and misleading information. (D. Van Zandt 8/5/2017) Updated (9/4/2021)
Last Updated on July 1, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources