Toronto 99 – Bias and Credibility

Toronto 99 - Right Bias - Conservative - Not Credible or ReliableFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate Toronto 99 as right-biased based on story selection and editorial positions that align with a conservative perspective. We also rate them as Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of poor sources and one-sided reporting that leaves out critical context.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT (6.7)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.0)
Country: Canada
MBFC Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

Founded by Mark Slapinski, Toronto 99 is an outlet that promotes an anti-mainstream tone but places greater emphasis on “freedom-focused” narratives and opposition to perceived censorship. Slapinski, a former journalist and independent commentator, is the driving force behind the publication.

Read our profile on Canadian media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Toronto 99 is owned by Mark Slapinski, with revenue derived through advertising and donations.

Analysis / Bias

Toronto 99 presents itself as a freedom-first news platform, often opposing mainstream media, Canadian governmental policies, and left-wing positions. Headlines are frequently sensational and frame narratives with emotionally charged language. For example, one article claims “Trudeau is toast,” while others accuse media outlets of being “state-run propaganda.” This mirrors typical rhetoric found in populist or right-leaning alternative outlets.

The site mixes aggregated news with original editorials and often lacks source transparency. Articles are rarely well-sourced and frequently rely on social media content, screenshots, or anonymous claims. Despite occasionally criticizing both political sides, the dominant editorial tone favors anti-left, anti-establishment, and anti-mainstream positions, aligning more closely with a Right populist perspective in its current form. In general, stories are reasonably fact-based but wholly one-sided.



Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate Toronto 99 as right-biased based on story selection and editorial positions that align with a conservative perspective. We also rate them as Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of poor sources and one-sided reporting that leaves out critical context. (D. Van Zandt 04/13/2025) Updated (04/19/2025)

Source: https://www.toronto99.com/

Last Updated on June 21, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: