A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Shared News Report
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Anti-Islam
Notes: On their about page, Shared News Report does not indicate who owns or edits the website content, however they describe their mission as ”Shared News Report is a leading political and world current affairs website. The website has always encouraged independent views, and never encouraged any party’s agenda.”
In review, Shared News Report is an extreme right wing biased website through story selection and wording. The sources used by Shared News Report are either from other extreme sources such as 0404 News: “Now The Arabs Of East Jerusalem Are Throwing Puppies At The IDF…Instead Of Rocks” or they use Infowars-Alex Jones, which is a factually low conspiracy site to back up their claims. For example: “COMPUTER AI ALGORITHM SHOWS TRUMP AT 65% APPROVAL RATING!” and “Muslims Demand The Queen Convert Or Leave England. Further, the majority of stories on the website are highly critical of Muslims through the publication of propaganda and conspiracy theories. Overall, we rate Shared News Report as a Questionable website due to extreme right wing bias, poor sourcing and promotion of both propaganda and conspiracy theories. (M. Huitsing 9/22/2017)
Update: As of 12/5/2018 this source is offline.
We signed the Pro-Truth Pledge:
please hold us accountable.
Ads do not necessarily reflect the views of MBFC