New York Times Post is rated Right-Center with Low factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate New York Times Post Right-Center biased based on its extensive reproduction of Fox News reporting and commentary. We rate it Low for factual reporting and Questionable due to anonymous ownership, zero transparency, plagiarism, poor sourcing, possible automated publishing, and misleading branding that imitates established news outlets.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Imposter Site, Lack of Transparency, Poor Sourcing, Plagiarism
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (4.3)
Factual Reporting: LOW (7.7)
Country: Unknown
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
New York Times Post is an anonymously operated news aggregation website. It has no meaningful About page, named editor, staff directory, author biographies, corrections policy, or explanation of its editorial process.
Despite its name, the website is not affiliated with The New York Times or the New York Post. Its branding appears designed to resemble established American news organizations and gain visibility through search engines (Imposter site)
Location: unknown
Funded by / Ownership
Ownership and funding are undisclosed. The site does not identify a company, publisher, editor, physical location, or source of revenue. No advertising, subscription system, or other clear monetization method was visible during review.
This complete lack of transparency makes it impossible to determine who controls the website or benefits from its content.
Analysis / Bias
New York Times Post primarily republishes material from other news organizations without proper attribution, links, or visible permission. Much of the reviewed content appears to be copied directly from Fox News, including Fox-specific promotional language such as “You can now listen to Fox News articles,” “Click here to download the Fox News app,” and internal Fox News story links that are displayed as plain text.
For example, DSA Candidate Pushes Federal AI Datacenter Moratorium With Michigan Early Voting Underway reproduces Fox News reporting but lists “nytimespost” as the author, removes the original reporter’s credit, and provides no link to Fox News.
Likewise, David Marcus: Reflecting Pool Controversy Is Mirror for Our Broken Politics is copied from a Fox News opinion column published under the same headline. The original identifies David Marcus and Fox News, while New York Times Post presents the work under its generic site account without linking to the source.
The site consistently reproduces Fox News political framing, resulting in a Right-Center editorial orientation. However, it does not appear to conduct original reporting or meaningful editorial review. Articles frequently lack paragraph formatting, source links, original bylines, and proper image or content attribution. The scale and uniformity of publication suggest automated or semi-automated aggregation, although there is insufficient evidence to confirm that artificial intelligence generates the content.
New York Times Post has also previously been identified as an impostor website that copied material from CNBC. Its current reproduction of Fox News content indicates that this practice remains central to the site.
Failed Fact Checks
- None found. However, the absence of fact checks does not indicate reliability. The site republishes unattributed third-party content, conceals original authorship, provides no editorial accountability, and has previously been identified as an impostor site that plagiarized established news organizations.
Overall, we rate New York Times Post Right-Center biased based on its extensive reproduction of Fox News reporting and commentary. We rate it Low for factual reporting and Questionable due to anonymous ownership, zero transparency, plagiarism, poor sourcing, possible automated publishing, and misleading branding that imitates established news outlets. (D. Van Zandt 08/04/2026)
Source: https://nytimespost.com/
Last Updated on August 4, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources