New Humanist

Last updated on August 20th, 2021 at 07:31 pm

New Humanist - Pro Science - Credible

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate the New Humanist a Pro-Science source that advocates for evidence-based reasoning.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: United Kingdom (33/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

New Humanist is a quarterly print magazine and website based in London/UK and published by the Rationalist Association. New Humanist was founded by C. A. Watts in November 1885 (under the name Watts’s Literary Guide). The main focus of this magazine is culture, news, philosophy, and science from a skeptical perspective. Some articles on this website require a subscription to view.

Read our profile on UK Media and Government.

Funded by / Ownership

The Rationalist Association owns and publishes the New Humanist. Subscription fees generate revenue.

Analysis / Bias

The New Humanist publishes news that focuses on culture, news, philosophy, and science from a skeptical perspective. Articles and headlines are well-sourced but do not contain hyperlinks because this is a print magazine. Headlines also describe the contents of the story, such as this How the fear of death gave birth to religion.

Editorially, many stories are opposed to religion as they are not related to evidence-based science, such as this Why is an anti-homophobia bill being fought by the Vatican? Some may think being opposed to religious dogma is a left-leaning perspective, but it is a free-thinking perspective that does not have left or right bias. In general, all information is factual.

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Overall, we rate the New Humanist a Pro-Science source that advocates for evidence-based reasoning. (M. Huitsing 8/23/2017)

Source: https://newhumanist.org.uk/

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

NFN-Low Biased Factual News

Video Advertisement