LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate progressive/liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor progressive/liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Marianne as left-center biased, evidenced by its focus on social issues like LGBTQ+ rights and critical examination of conservative parties, reflecting a progressive editorial perspective. The magazine is mostly factual, relying on in-depth reporting and personal testimonies, yet its use of citations can be inconsistent.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: France
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Marianne, founded in 1997 by Jean-François Kahn and Maurice Szafran, is a French news magazine headquartered in Paris. Initially characterized as having a left-wing sovereigntist perspective, it has since shifted toward a right-wing orientation as Czech Media Invest acquired a significant stake in the magazine in 2018. Marianne covers a wide range of topics, including politics, economics, culture, and social issues. Its online presence complements its print edition, providing readers with further content, including podcasts.
Read our profile on France’s Media and Government
Funded by / Ownership
Marianne’s primary shareholder was Robert Assaraf’s company, which held 49.3% of shares before Czech Media Invest acquired it in 2018. The magazine sustains itself financially through newsstand sales, subscriptions, and advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Marianne critiques government actions, blending investigative journalism with opinion, often adopting a critical tone. For example, the article “Municipal: ‘The destiny of Turkey is in Erdogan’s hands alone'” suggests a critical bias, focusing on Erdogan’s authoritarian tendencies and potential for political dominance. The analysis emphasizes Erdogan’s control over Turkey’s destiny and the authoritarian aspects of his regime. While the piece presents facts about Turkey’s political situation, the framing, mainly focusing on Erdogan’s autocratic tendencies, indicates a critical bias. The article lacks external hyperlinks to support its claims, relying on circular citations within the magazine.
Another article, “Rootedness of the richest, contradictions on the economy: the social imposture of the RN,” critiques the National Rally (RN), scrutinizing its commitment to working-class interests. They use emotionally loaded wording in the title, such as “imposture,” which suggests skepticism towards the RN’s socio-economic policies. The article references Éric Zemmour’s comments to frame the RN’s ideological stance, contributing to the article’s critical tone.
Éric Zemmour, known for his right-wing views, is often considered more extreme than Marine Le Pen of the National Rally (RN). The overall presentation and language in the article emphasize doubts about the RN’s political claims and strategies. This coverage demonstrates a critical perspective on the RN. The article further cites Public Sénat, a state-owned television channel, to discuss the RN’s policies and actions.
Lastly, the article by Simon Bentolila in Marianne, titled “We’re going to kill you, you dirty PD”: three gay migrants testify” discusses the challenges faced by LGBTQ+ migrant individuals seeking asylum, showing a supportive stance towards LGBTQ+ rights. The narrative is based on the personal accounts of the individuals interviewed, focusing on their specific experiences with persecution and the asylum process due to their LGBTQ+ status.
Marianne also collaborates and republishes content from Agence France-Presse (AFP), as evidenced by the attribution in their article titles.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Marianne as left-center biased, evidenced by its focus on social issues like LGBTQ+ rights and critical examination of conservative parties, reflecting a progressive editorial perspective. The magazine is mostly factual, relying on in-depth reporting and personal testimonies, yet its use of citations can be inconsistent. (M. Huitsing 03/30/2024)
Source: https://www.marianne.net/
Last Updated on March 30, 2024 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources