A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.
Bias: Extreme Left, Propaganda
Notes: Loser.com is a domain name which existed as a URL redirect to several different webpages during most of its existence. As of April 2017, it is a news website that publishes articles opposing Donald Trump.
Where to start. Loser.com does not have an about page or a disclaimer. There isn’t a single hyperlinked source to be found for their news information. All articles favor the left and use excessive loaded language such as: “Trump issues unhinged decree: Hire accused pedophile, fire journalists who expose him.” While much of the information is rooted in fact, it almost always is opinion based anti-Trump propaganda. Overall, this is a questionable source due to extreme left wing bias, poor sourcing and promotion of propaganda. (D. Van Zandt 12/9/2017)
Latest from Loser.com
Despite a bombshell New York Times report, Trump isn’t firing Rosenstein — for now
‘Bullyism’: China says it won’t negotiate on trade with the US as the latest tariffs bite
Trump is wielding the gavel at the UN Security Council meeting on Wednesday. Here’s what to expect.
Vacuums, tires, and computer parts: These are the goods that will be hit the hardest by Trump’s new China tariffs
Alyssa Milano opened up about being sexually assaulted as a teen to explain why some victims don’t report: ‘Justice was never an option’
We signed the Pro-Truth Pledge:
please hold us accountable.
Ads do not necessarily reflect the views of MBFC