Korrespondent is rated Right-Center with Mostly Factual factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources are slight to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
- Overall, we rate Korrespondent Right-Center biased based on pro-Ukrainian, anti-Russian, and generally pro-Western framing that favors Ukraine’s national-security position and European-aligned foreign policy. We rate it Mostly Factual due to generally sourced reporting and factual caution in some articles, offset by opaque ownership concerns, oligarch-linked media history, commercial content disclosures, and strong wartime editorial framing.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER (2.8)
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (4.2)
Country: Ukraine
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
Korrespondent.net is a Ukrainian online news website launched in 2000 and published in Ukrainian and Russian. The site covers Ukrainian politics, world news, business, sports, entertainment, and the Russia-Ukraine war. Its contacts page identifies the outlet as the online media entity “Korespondent.net,” lists a Kyiv address, editorial email contacts, phone numbers, and media identifier R40-06068.
Read our profile on the Ukrainian media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Korrespondent.net is part of UMH Group, a Ukrainian media holding historically associated with oligarch ownership. Media Ownership Monitor reported that Korrespondent.net is part of UMH and identified Serhiy Kurchenko, a Ukrainian businessman linked to former pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, as the effective owner through opaque ownership structures. The site generates revenue through advertising, special projects, promotional content, and other commercial placements. Its contacts page states that certain categories, including “Opinion,” “Expertise,” “Statement,” “Regions,” “Money,” “Power,” “Elections,” “Test Drive,” “Special Projects,” and “Promo,” may be published as advertising or commercial content, which is an important transparency disclosure.
Analysis / Bias
Korrespondent.net’s current news coverage is strongly shaped by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Rather than fitting cleanly into a U.S. left-right scale, the site is best characterized as pro-Ukrainian and anti-Russian in its war coverage. This is common among Ukrainian mainstream outlets, but it does influence framing, word choice, and story selection.
For example, Drones reached Tyumen refinery two thousand km from Ukraine reports on a drone attack inside Russia using official Russian statements, Russian Telegram channel ASTRA, OSINT analysis, and social media video evidence. The article includes useful caveats, noting that there was no independent confirmation of the extent of the damage, which supports factual caution.
Similarly, Russia attacked a logistics operator’s building in Zaporizhia: there are injuries relies on local Ukrainian official Ivan Fedorov and reports the incident in straightforward wartime language. The framing is clearly hostile toward Russia, using terms such as “hostile attack,” but the factual claim is sourced to a named regional official.
In Trump almost “handed over” Ukraine to Putin – Macron, the article summarizes comments from French President Emmanuel Macron and frames the alleged Trump–Putin negotiations as dangerous for Ukraine. The article uses attributed claims and links the story to broader Ukraine war diplomacy, but the headline and framing are emotionally favorable to Ukraine’s position.
Overall, Korrespondent.net generally relies on named officials, wire-style reporting, social media monitoring, OSINT sources, and attributed statements. However, ownership concerns, opaque historical control through UMH/Kurchenko-linked structures, wartime framing, commercial content categories, and heavy pro-Ukrainian/anti-Russian editorial perspective prevent a High factual rating.
Failed Fact Checks
- None found by IFCN-approved fact-checkers.
Overall, we rate Korrespondent Right-Center biased based on pro-Ukrainian, anti-Russian, and generally pro-Western framing that favors Ukraine’s national-security position and European-aligned foreign policy. We rate it Mostly Factual due to generally sourced reporting and factual caution in some articles, offset by opaque ownership concerns, oligarch-linked media history, commercial content disclosures, and strong wartime editorial framing. (D. Van Zandt 06/20/2026)
Source: https://ua.korrespondent.net/
Last Updated on June 20, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources