QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Intelli.News as Questionable due to a complete lack of ownership transparency, apparent reliance on AI-generated or automated content, unverifiable authorship, and unclear sourcing practices. We also rate it Mixed for factual reporting, as articles may be loosely based on real news events, but the opaque content pipeline and absence of editorial accountability result in low overall credibility.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Imposter Site, Lack of Transparency, Misleading Content, AI
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (0.0)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.1)
Country: Unknown
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Intelli.News presents itself as a global news aggregation and publishing platform offering coverage across politics, culture, business, and international affairs. Its About Us page contains broad mission language but provides no verifiable history, founding date, corporate structure, physical location, or named editorial leadership. The site functions primarily as a republisher of externally sourced content.
Location: Unknown
Funded by / Ownership
Intelli.News states that it is funded through advertising. No ownership information, corporate registration, parent company, or responsible individuals are disclosed on the site. There is no transparency regarding who operates or controls the platform, which significantly undermines credibility.
Analysis / Bias
Intelli.News does not operate as an original reporting outlet but instead republishes content that appears to be automatically rewritten or reformatted from other sites. Articles such as Love Is Blind: France Contestants Take Legal Action Over Alleged Inhumane Treatment During Filming, Is Trump Gaining Ground in Germany? Just 12% of Germans Think So, and Johnson to Deliver Inspiring Speech to UK Parliament Celebrating America’s 250th Birthday all credit external sources while linking to Mondial News, which itself lacks an About page and clear ownership.
The writing style across Intelli.News articles is uniform, generic, and consistent with AI-generated or automated text, and author bylines list individuals whose profile images appear to be AI-generated. Additionally, the site does not consistently hyperlink original reporting sources within article text, further obscuring sourcing transparency. While the topics themselves are not overtly ideological, the lack of editorial standards, opaque sourcing chains, and automation-driven presentation raises significant reliability concerns.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years. Appears to be an AI-generated site.
Overall, we rate Intelli.News as Questionable due to a complete lack of ownership transparency, apparent reliance on AI-generated or automated content, unverifiable authorship, and unclear sourcing practices. We also rate it Mixed for factual reporting, as articles may be loosely based on real news events, but the opaque content pipeline and absence of editorial accountability result in low overall credibility. (D. Van Zandt 01/10/2026)
Source: https://intelli.news/
Last Updated on January 10, 2026 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources