PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
- Overall, we rate Cell Reports Methods as a Pro-Science journal. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Journal
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
History
Cell Reports Methods is a peer-reviewed open-access journal published by Cell Press that covers methodological advances in science. According to its about page, “Cell Reports Methods is an open access, multidisciplinary journal from Cell Press publishing significant methodological advances of broad interest.”
Cell Press, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, publishes over 50 scientific journals. Cell Press Journals are 50% open-access as of 2023.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
Cell Reports Methods is published by Cell Press which is a subsidiary of Elsevier, a Dutch information and analytics company and one of the world’s foremost providers of scientific, technical, and medical information. It was established in 1880 as a publishing company. Elsevier’s parent company is RELX plc, a British multinational information and analytics company headquartered in London, England. The journal generates revenue through subscription fees and fees for open-access publishing.
Analysis / Bias
Cell Reports Methods is a hybrid (some open-access) journal that publishes information and research in translational and clinical biomedical sciences. The journal primarily publishes research such as this NanoB2 to monitor interactions of ligands with membrane proteins by combining nanobodies and NanoBRET.
Cell Press is an open-access/hybrid publisher of scientific journals. There are two types of Open Access Journals, legitimate and predatory, both of which charge the author for publication. Predatory journals often lack peer review and are generally considered not credible. The Cell Reports Methods is considered a legitimate, open-access publisher that is frequently indexed in PubMed. However, Cell Press has been criticized for retracting some studies.
Although Cell Press has retracted some studies in other publications, Cell Reports Methods publishes credible scientific studies that are factual and appropriately peer-reviewed.
Failed Fact Checks
- None in the Last 5 years
Overall, we rate Cell Reports Methods as a Pro-Science journal. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record. (D. Van Zandt 04/17/2023)
Source: https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-methods/
Last Updated on May 17, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources