QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Brokeonomics.News as Far-Left Biased and Low in Factual Reporting due to its reliance on social media sourcing, lack of transparency, and clickbait sensationalism. The site provides little to no verifiable news content and should be treated as unreliable.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Sensationalism, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.3)
Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Brokeonomics.News appears to be a fringe political blog with no identifiable founders, staff, or contact information. Its “About” page is a generic placeholder, suggesting little effort toward transparency or professionalism.
Location: Unknown
Funded by / Ownership
The site is monetized through advertising, given the heavy presence of click-driven ads. No ownership or editorial disclosures are provided.
Analysis / Bias
Brokeonomics.News functions as a clickbait, ad-heavy blog pushing highly partisan, anti-Trump narratives. Articles such as “Kash Patel Refuses to Answer Question: Is Donald Trump in the Epstein Files?” and “Trump Begs for Help from the Korean Workers He Just Deported” rely entirely on social media speculation and commentary, not independent reporting or verifiable evidence. The language is heavily sensationalized, aimed at provoking outrage rather than informing readers.
With no transparency, no professional sourcing standards, and a reliance on exaggerated rhetoric, Brokeonomics.News lacks credibility. It mirrors the style of “rage-click” sites designed for traffic rather than journalistic integrity.
Failed Fact Checks
- No direct fact checks found, but the lack of credible sourcing and sensational claims strongly suggests unreliability.
Overall, we rate Brokeonomics.News as Far-Left Biased and Low in Factual Reporting due to its reliance on social media sourcing, lack of transparency, and clickbait sensationalism. The site provides little to no verifiable news content and should be treated as unreliable. (D. Van Zandt 09/22/2025)
Source: https://brokeonomics.news/
Last Updated on September 22, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources