BreakingNews60s.com – Bias and Credibility

BreakingNews60s - Least Biased - Questionable - Imposter Site - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Very Low - Biased - Not Credible - Fake News


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate BreakingNews60s.com as Questionable. Due to the complete lack of factual reporting, transparency, and journalistic integrity, BreakingNews60s.com earns a Very Low factual rating and is designated a fake news site. It should be avoided.

Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Lack of Transparency, Misleading Content, Poor Sourcing, Imposter
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (0.0)
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW (9.9)
Country: Unknown
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

BreakingNews60s.com is a deceptive and inauthentic news website that falsely presents itself as a professional media outlet named “News Hour Productions,” a name which it misleadingly associates with legitimate PBS programming. Its “About” and “Contact” pages list a fake Arlington, Virginia address (1234 Broad Street) and a fake phone number (+1 (555) 123-4567), both of which are commonly reused on other known fake news and imposter websites including:

These websites appear to be part of a larger network of imposter or fabricated clickbait sites, many of which use recycled layouts, phony branding, and invented staff information

Funded by / Ownership

There is no transparency about ownership or editorial leadership, and no verifiable legal entity is listed. The only contact given is an unverifiable Gmail address. There is no trace of a legitimate business registration matching “NEW NEWS PAPERUSA” or the supposedly affiliated “News Hour Productions” at the given address.

The site is monetized exclusively through low-quality digital ads, indicating a clear financial incentive to produce viral misinformation for click revenue.

Analysis / Bias

BreakingNews60s.com primarily pushes viral misinformation cloaked in a sensationalist news format. A key example includes a fabricated viral article falsely claiming that NBC’s Garrett Haake humiliated Karoline Leavitt during a press briefing. This article was fully debunked by Lead Stories, confirming that the event never occurred.



Other articles on the site present exaggerated, misleading, or fictional stories involving major media figures like David Muir, with zero sourcing or corroboration, and no bylines or timestamps, common traits of coordinated disinformation sites.

There is no evidence of original reporting, credible sourcing, or journalistic standards. Most stories are clearly fabricated to mislead readers for profit.

In general, it is a fraudulent imposter website that fabricates news stories to generate ad revenue through viral disinformation. It uses fake contact information, no editorial transparency, and recycles infrastructure from other known imposter sites. It has zero credibility and regularly publishes provably false claims.

Failed Fact Checks

  • See above

Overall, we rate BreakingNews60s.com as Questionable. Due to the complete lack of factual reporting, transparency, and journalistic integrity, BreakingNews60s.com earns a Very Low factual rating and is designated a fake news site. It should be avoided. (D. Van Zandt 07/08/2025)

Source: https://breakingnews60s.com/

Last Updated on July 8, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: