LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate 2paragraphs.com as Left-biased based on frequent criticism of right-wing politicians and framing of issues through a progressive lens. We rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to inconsistent sourcing practices, one-sided reporting, and a lack of transparency.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT (-5.3)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (4.6)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
History
2paragraphs.com is a digital media site launched in 2012. According to its About page, the outlet was created to deliver short, accessible summaries of current news, culture, and entertainment in two-paragraph form. The site is based in the United States, and the Contact page provides communication links for tips and inquiries, but lacks details about staff or editorial leadership.
Read our profile on the United States media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
2paragraphs.com is independently owned by 2paragraphs Productions LLC. It does not disclose any major institutional or donor support and appears to be funded through advertising revenue from programmatic display ads across the site.
Analysis / Bias
2paragraphs exhibits a left bias, especially in its political coverage, which frequently presents U.S. right-wing figures and Donald Trump in a negative light. For example, the article “Gov. Josh Shapiro Stopped Trump’s ‘Unlawful Decision’ to Revoke $200 Million From Public Schools” is framed from a progressive standpoint and sources information from NPR, a generally reliable center-left outlet.
Another example, “Ex-FBI Director on Right-Wing Domestic Terrorism Fueled by Demagoguery, ‘I Wish It Weren’t So Real’”, reflects a strong editorial framing that critiques right-wing extremism. Meanwhile, articles such as “MAGA Congressman Slams Pentagon, ‘Just Hogs In A Trough’” rely heavily on political commentary sourced from Twitter, raising concerns about sourcing standards and context.
The site’s structure prioritizes brevity, often at the cost of depth and original reporting. While some articles cite reputable third-party sources, others are based solely on social media or statements from public figures, sometimes without verification or additional background.
Failed Fact Checks
- There are no known failed fact checks specifically associated with 2paragraphs.com. However, the minimal context in some articles and heavy reliance on social media raises caution regarding accuracy and editorial rigor.
Overall, we rate 2paragraphs.com as Left-biased based on frequent criticism of right-wing politicians and framing of issues through a progressive lens. We rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to inconsistent sourcing practices, one-sided reporting, and a lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt 05/07/2025)
Source: https://2paragraphs.com/
Last Updated on May 7, 2025 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources