Fact check: Does a video show people being paid to storm the US border?

Congressman Matt Gaetz tweeted a video showing two men giving cash to people and claimed it shows people in Honduras being given cash to β€œstorm the US border.”

Background: Matt Gaetz is the freshman Congressman who GQ Magazine has called β€œthe Trumpiest Congressman in Trump’s Washington,” meaning that he has a tendency to make bold statements that are widely viewed as controversial.

According to theΒ Conservative Tribune by Western Journal, the claim is that a brewing β€œMarch of the Migrant” involving thousands of people marching from Honduras through Guatemala and Mexico in time to be at the US border for the mid-term elections may be externally funded, possibly by George Soros.

The video was quickly picked up and amplified by President Donald Trump, whoΒ reposted it.

But on Thursday afternoon, Luis Assandro, a Guatemalan journalist, tracked down both the location of the video and spoke to people involved, debunking Gaetz’s speculation about who was getting paid and why. According to Jack Crosbie, writing forΒ Splinter News – an admittedly left leaning news service – the video was made in Guatemala and the money came from locals.

Gaetz, himself, has tweeted anΒ update, stating he believed the video came from Honduras because it came from a Honduran official.

The Conservative Tribune is listed as aΒ Questionable sourceΒ by the media bias rating website, Media Bias Fact Check (MBFC). MBFC specifies this rating is based on β€œextreme right wing bias and numerous failed fact checks.”

Overall, this is false until proven otherwise. The video originates from Guatemala and is not part of a conspiracy to storm the border, though it is certainly true there is a migrant caravan (up to 3000) that has been stopped by Mexico. Further, there is zero evidence to support the claim that George Soros is involved in any way. Snopes has also reviewed this claim and has determined it was false stating “This tweet was replete with factual inaccuracies and baseless accusations.”

Source: WikiTribune with Dave Van Zandt as collaborator. This fact check remains open for editing on WikiTribune, but as of this writing this is an unproven conspiracy theory.

[wordads]

β˜… SUPPORT OUR MISSION

MBFC relies entirely on readers like you.

No corporate or political donors. Your support keeps our 11,000+ ratings 100% independent.

Starting at $3 /month β€” ad-free + exclusive content
  • Remove all ads instantly
  • Support independent ratings
  • Cancel any time β€” no strings
β˜… Go Ad-Free β€” from $3/mo ❀ One-Time Donation Data API Access
Membership removes ads β€’ Donations do not

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Subscribe With Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22K other subscribers



Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Billy Dunn

So why is it false until proven otherwise? Why couldnt it be true until proven otherwise?

dhfabian

Nutty. How are they going to get settled and round up enough false documentation in order to register to vote in the first place?

The Dems use PayPal πŸ˜‚