Polarization, Partisanship and Junk News Consumption over Social Media in the US

What kinds of social media users read junk news? An Oxford University study analyzed the distribution of the most significant sources of junk news in the three months before President Donald Trump’s first State of the Union Address. Drawing on a list of sources that consistently publish political news and information that is extremist, sensationalist, conspiratorial, masked commentary, fake news and other forms of junk news, they found that the distribution of such content is unevenly spread across the ideological spectrum. They demonstrate that (1) on Twitter, a network of Trump supporters shares the widest range of known junk news sources and circulates more junk news than all the other groups put together; (2) on Facebook, extreme hard right pages—distinct from Republican pages—share the widest range of known junk news sources and circulate more junk news than all the other audiences put together; (3) on average, the audiences for junk news on Twitter share a wider range of known junk news sources than audiences on Facebook’s public pages.

Read the full Oxford University Study: http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2018/02/Polarization-Partisanship-JunkNews.pdf

View a critique of this study: https://hoax-alert.leadstories.com/3468960-oxford-study-does-not-prove-right-wingers-share-and-believe-more-fake-news.html


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

Subscribe With Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to MBFC and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 22.9K other subscribers



Be the first to comment on "Polarization, Partisanship and Junk News Consumption over Social Media in the US"

Comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.