Actuators Journal

Actuators Journal - Pro Science - Credible and Reliable

Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Mostly Credible and Reliable


PRO-SCIENCE

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Actuators Journal Pro-Science and Mostly Factual for reporting due to being published by a company that has failed fact checks in other journals.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: Switzerland
Press Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT
Media Type: Journal
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

History

The Actuators Journal is published by MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute), formerly Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an open-access journal publisher based in Basel, Switzerland. The journal covers the science and technology of actuators and control systems published monthly online. MDPI publishes over 400 journals.

Read our profile on Swiss Media and Government.

Funded by / Ownership

The publisher of Actuators Journal is MDPI AG, which Shu-Kun Lin owns. Here is the list of the Management Team. According to “MDPI Open Access Information and Policy.” MDPI articles and all its journals are open access where authors pay a one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) to cover the costs of peer review administration and management; here is “General Information on MDPI’s Article Processing Charges (APC).”

Analysis / Bias

The Actuators Journal covers the science and technology of actuators and control systems. Studies are published via open access, such as this Design and Analysis of a Compliant End-Effector for Robotic Polishing Using Flexible Beams. Like all others reviewed, this study is Pro-Science, well-researched, and low-biased. 

While the Actuators Journal has not failed a fact-check, its publisher has faced criticism as an open-access predatory journal. Read our full review on MDPI.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate the Actuators Journal Pro-Science and Mostly Factual for reporting due to being published by a company that has failed fact checks in other journals. (M. Huitsing 10/06/2022)

Source: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/actuators

Last Updated on October 6, 2022 by Media Bias Fact Check

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources