CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Greatist is currently pending or under review. When deciding to evaluate a source we do a preliminary investigation to determine if the source qualifies for review. Qualifications include high traffic, popularity, controversy, strong bias, and the potential for false or misleading information.
About: We sift through the noise, delivering expert-vetted health info through a real-life lens. We’re here to support and inspire, so you can take actions every day to live your best life. Whether we’re talking breakfast, breathing, or brain health, you can trust that all Greatist content is evidence-based, science-backed, and expert-approved.
Media Type: Website
Assessment Type: Traffic overview, Headlines, Background research
Preliminary Assessment: Low Credibility
Bias: Pseudoscience
Country: USA
Confidence of Initial Assessment: Medium
Failed Fact Checks: Evidence of Pseudoscience claims
Source: https://greatist.com/
Last Updated on May 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources