Genetic Literacy Project

Has this Media Source failed a fact check?  LET US KNOW HERE.


Genetic Literacy Project - Pro Science - Non Biased

Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing.  Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words.  These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Notes: According to The Genetic Literacy Project (GLP) they “explore the intersection of DNA research and real-world applications of genetics with the media and policy worlds in order to disentangle science from ideology.”  The GLP has been accused of accepting funding from corporations that are involved in the agriculture genetics business due to their acceptance of the consensus of science as it relates to GMOs.  On the GLP website, they offer a full disclosure of their funding which indicates they do not receive funding from Pro-GMO companies such as Monsanto. (D. Van Zandt 12/15/2016)


Media Bias Fact Check LogoProtecting you from fake news sites since 2015

[the_ad id="86448"]