Censored.News – Bias and Credibility

Censored.News - Right Bias - Questionable - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Censored.News extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, fake news, poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2015, Censored.News is an anonymously run far-right conspiracy and pseudoscience news aggregation site. They 100% lack transparency as they disclose nothing.

The domain is registered in the United States.

Funded by / Ownership

Censored.News lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Advertising generates revenue.

Analysis / Bias

Censored.News does not produce original content but rather links to other sources through news feeds. The sources they promote reads like a who’s who of far-right conspiracy, pseudoscience, and fake news. Some of the sources they promote are The Epoch Times (Questionable), Natural News (Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy), National File (Conspiracy), Newstarget (Quackery Pseudoscience), and Children’s Health Defense (Quack anti-Vaxx propaganda). For news aggregation sites such as this, our rating is based on the sources they use. In this case, Censored.News is extreme right biased and 100% lacking in credibility.

Failed Fact Checks

  • They do not produce original content, but the sources they use all have terrible records with fact-checkers.

Overall, we rate Censored.News extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, fake news, poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt 4/14/2017) Updated (08/22/2022)



Source: https://www.censored.news/

Last Updated on May 17, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: