Natural Health Response – Bias and Credibility

Natural Health Response - Conspiracy - Fake News - Anti-Vaxx Bias - Not CredibleNatural Health Response - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Anti-Vaxx Bias - Not Credible

Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable


CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Natural Health Response a quackery-level pseudoscience based on promoting anti-vaccine and anti-science propaganda that does not align with the consensus of facts.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

According to the Natural Health Response about page, they claim “For years he’s been the trusted doctor for celebrities, world-class athletes, and countless seniors looking to reclaim their health. And now…for the first time ever… he’s making his medical breakthroughs available to readers all across America. Dr. Richard Gerhauser, M.D. is one of the most pioneering and innovative minds in medicine today – and he delivers cutting-edge cures each month through his Natural Health Response newsletter.”

The website was formerly called the Alliance for Advanced Health.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

NewMarket Health Publishing, LLC owns and publishes the Natural Health Response. Subscription fees generate revenue.



Analysis / Bias

In review, the Natural Health Response promotes anti-vaccination propaganda such as this NEVER Get the Flu! (No Vaccine Necessary) and conspiracies where the Government is withholding cancer cures for the benefit of Big Pharma. Natural Health Response Health does publish credible info, but overall, we rate them a Conspiracy-Pseudoscience site based on promoting anti-vaccination propaganda and government conspiracies.

Failed Fact Checks

  • A third party has not fact-checked them.

Overall, we rate the Natural Health Response a quackery-level pseudoscience based on promoting anti-vaccine and anti-science propaganda that does not align with the consensus of facts. (D. Van Zandt 1/28/2018) Updated (10/18/2023)

Source: https://naturalhealthresponse.com/

Last Updated on October 18, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media: