CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Overall, we rate The Truth Seeker a Tin Foil Hat Level Conspiracy website due to impossible claims. We also rate them Low for factual reporting for the same reasons.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: United Kingdom
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Founded in 2011, The Truthseeker is a conspiracy website that does not always align with science. They completely lack transparency as they do not offer an about page or name authors.
Read our profile on UK media and government.
Funded by / Ownership
The website does not disclose ownership, and it is not clear how they generate revenue.
Analysis / Bias
In review, The Truthseeker is a conspiracy website that promotes unproven claims such as Dangerous 5G Streetlights with VIRUS Death Beams – THE TRUTH! (Feat. Mark Steele). 5G conspiracy theories have been thoroughly debunked. The website also promotes chemtrails such as this SHOCK CLAIM: Chemtrails ‘will wipe out humans’ causing biblical-style floods, says expert as well as claims of aliens in Corn Flakes. In general, this is a tin-foil crackpot conspiracy website.
Failed Fact Checks
- They have not been fact-checked by a third party. See the above examples.
Overall, we rate The Truth Seeker a Tin Foil Hat Level Conspiracy website due to impossible claims. We also rate them Low for factual reporting for the same reasons. (D. Van Zandt 7/21/2016) Updated (01/03/2023)
Source: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/
Last Updated on July 1, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or
Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources